版本差异
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+26-0
11 # The University of Tennessee, Knoxville AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.
5+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Faculty/Staff Members responsible for the delivery of a course are expected to clearly communicate to Students the permitted use(s), if any, of AI technology in connection with a course.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: The University of Tennessee system AI policy says protected university data must not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University CIO or designee and authorized for use.
10+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Protected University Data shall not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University’s Chief Information Officer (or designee) and authorized for use.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.
15+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Course-related communications pertaining to the use of AI technology shall: (i) affirm the importance of academic honesty; and (ii) inform Students that the unpermitted use of AI technology is a form of academic misconduct.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+academic_integrity: UTK Libraries guidance says submitting generative-AI-created or rewritten assessment work as one's own is cheating, and advises students to check with professors and instructors about coursework use.
20+Evidence (en, 866424276138): Getting a generative AI to create or re-write your assessment and then submitting that work as your own, is cheating. It is the same as asking another human to do your work for you.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.
25+Evidence (en-US, 7830749d0ff5): If your instructor allows you to use GenAI for writing assignments, use it to assist rather than replace your research and writing processes, and always document and describe your use.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+ai_tool_treatment: UTK Writing Center guidance says instructors may set different GenAI rules for each course, and the sample syllabus page presents open, moderate, and strict AI-use guideline examples.
30+Evidence (en-US, 7830749d0ff5): Read each instructor’s policy on using GenAI (found on the course syllabus), and follow each carefully. UTK instructors may make their own rules about whether and how you can use GenAI in their course.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
1432 ## Source attribution added
1533 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
34+Source https://libguides.utk.edu/Generative-AI/ethical-evaluative snapshot 86642427613813a926bdab7934bce4b3cddba698be87c1b7984e5dbb18a45815
35+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
1636 ## Source attribution added
1737 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
38+Source https://policy.tennessee.edu/policy/bt0035-policy-on-artificial-intelligence/ snapshot 30c1850329fb91b3b78ed1a6ada3821697d8d085f1457f2cf17d5f6d7d5a0f1e
39+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
1840 ## Source attribution added
1941 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
42+Source https://writingcenter.utk.edu/ai-tools-and-writing-information-for-students/ snapshot 7830749d0ff56b002e93a16d4999c086bd3717b235cc6b252bec46042e8032e8
43+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
2044 ## Source attribution added
2145 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
46+Source https://writingcenter.utk.edu/sample-syllabus-statements-for-ai-guidelines/ snapshot 919550d15db56592ee0180126ca75aa528bbfbe4e010e3648f433250653538c6
47+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-17T04:34:08Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.