版本差异
Czech Technical University in Prague
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
Czech Technical University in Prague public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+24-0
11 # Czech Technical University in Prague AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+privacy: CTU's AI framework identifies sharing sensitive research data, personal data, and contractually concealed data with AI tools as significant cyber risks and states that AI cannot keep confidentiality or protect personal data.
5+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): The use of AI can present significant cyber risks. The most significant risks include the sharing of: sensitive data from ongoing or completed research; personal data ...; data created within the framework of contractual research under an agreement on data concealment. AI is not able to keep confidentiality of shared information or protect personal data.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:34:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: CTU's AI framework marks AI use for examinations, tests, and homework as not appropriate for students unless teacher instructions or the assessment design clearly allow it.
10+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): Using AI in other stages of learning: Doing examinations and tests - NO ... A breach of the rules may result in penalization in accordance with the Disciplinary Code for Students of CTU. Homework - NO ... When using AI tools, students must follow their teacher's instructions.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:34:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: For bachelor and follow-up master study at CTU, AI-tool use in fulfilling programme and subject requirements must be clearly defined and described and must comply with the relevant programme, subject, and thesis-ethics rules.
15+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): The use of AI tools in fulfilling the requirements of study programmes and individual subjects must always be clearly defined and described ... and must comply with the rules of the given study programme and the given subjects and the Methodological Guideline on Adherence to Ethical Principles in Preparation of Graduation Theses.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:34:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+source_status: Czech Technical University in Prague has a current central methodological guideline for framework rules on generative AI use by bachelor and follow-up master students and teachers.
20+Evidence (en, e158054685d3): Current version: Methodical guideline No. 5/2023 - Framework rules for the use of artificial intelligence at CTU for study and pedagogical purposes in Bachelor and continuing Masters studies. Issued on: 29.01.2024. Effective as of: 29.01.2024. Valid as of: 19.02.2024.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:33:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: Where AI use is relevant for a CTU subject, teachers should set and publish clear subject-level rules for AI use, including the justification for those rules.
25+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): If relevant for the given subject, teachers should set and publish on the website of the subject clear rules for the use of AI in their subjects, including the justification of these rules so that students understand why the rules are set the way they are.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:34:00.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: CTU's graduation-thesis ethics guideline treats failure to acknowledge and document AI-tool text or other AI outcomes in a thesis, while presenting them as one's own, as plagiarism.
30+Evidence (en, 3f0b3d43cf64): Prohibited ways of working with information sources: Plagiarism ... not acknowledging and documenting the use of text or other outcomes of AI tools in the thesis and presenting them as one's own.
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:35:00.000Z
1432 ## Source attribution added
1533 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
34+Source https://www.cvut.cz/en/legislation-and-study-regulations snapshot e158054685d36c6d86a012f4e93195f0ae933d201a175c1b7ddc94f0da1f5348
35+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:33:00.000Z
1636 ## Source attribution added
1737 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
38+Source https://www.cvut.cz/sites/default/files/content/d1dc93cd-5894-4521-b799-c7e715d3c59e/en/20240220-methodical-guideline-no-52023-rev2.pdf snapshot d21c99396162b1a4da0210f931cc1ae73b793592f0b2ed4abc5639954f419d52
39+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:34:00.000Z
1840 ## Source attribution added
1941 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
42+Source https://www.cvut.cz/sites/default/files/content/d1dc93cd-5894-4521-b799-c7e715d3c59e/en/20240221-methodical-guideline-no-22024.pdf snapshot 3f0b3d43cf64b4c53a3c47df132b0b3c66141614f48d236c4fdf0ccddf60c56d
43+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-16T20:35:00.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.