public-release-20260715-005
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
McMaster University public-release-20260715-005 差异
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
McMaster University currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 McMaster University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
9 声明 条记录
Microsoft Copilot is listed for McMaster University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
McMaster's teaching and learning generative AI guidelines say undergraduate and graduate course outlines should state acceptable and unacceptable generative AI use, and students should seek clarification and written confirmation if no syllabus statement is included.
McMaster's student generative AI coursework tip sheet tells students not to use generative AI unless a course syllabus or professor explicitly allows it, and to disclose and cite AI-generated content when allowed.
McMaster's teaching and learning guidelines say generative AI tools should not provide letter or numeric grades for student work, while AI-generated feedback may be used only under stated conditions such as syllabus inclusion and an opt-out ability.
McMaster's operational excellence generative AI guidelines tell employees not to upload confidential, personal, personal health, or proprietary information to a generative AI tool unless required security/privacy assessments have been completed, while noting an enterprise Microsoft Copilot exception when logged in with McMaster credentials.
McMaster's research generative AI guidelines say researchers are personally accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work, should critically evaluate and verify AI outputs, and should cite or acknowledge generative AI use according to McMaster Library guidance and publication or granting instructions.
McMaster's Provost academic integrity page says McMaster has not activated Turnitin's AI Detector, while privacy/security and reliability assessment work is underway and activation may allow retroactive submissions.
McMaster's privacy considerations page says that for tools including automated functions, including artificial intelligence, the university must conduct an Algorithmic Impact Assessment, with the Privacy Office responsible for the AIA process.
McMaster University Libraries' generative AI citation guide warns that generative AI can generate incorrect, outdated, or biased content, can fabricate sources, and that information shared with generative AI tools can compromise privacy and security.
8 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月16日 02:21
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_pdf Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 04:04