academic_integrity
Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Flinders University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Flinders University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Flinders University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Flinders University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Flinders University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.
3+Evidence (en, f3ccd9f38fb4): Students have specific responsibility to: Use AI models in ethical and responsible ways that are consistent with the University’s assessment and academic integrity policies and procedures, and the terms of use of the AI providers.
4+academic_integrity: Flinders' student academic integrity page states that misusing AI tools includes using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without topic coordinator permission and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.
5+Evidence (en, 7e8e3f4e9aea): Misusing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools includes the use of AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without the permission of your topic coordinator and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.
6+teaching: Flinders provides staff with AI assessment scale template instructions that range from no AI permitted through prompted, assisted, task-completion, and full AI use, with acknowledgement expectations attached to permitted use.
7+Evidence (en, 5635a3051de2): For this assessment task, students are permitted to use in-built generative AI such as slide design or grammatical/editing but are required to generate their own responses in line with conditions and expectations of the task outlined in the instructions.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Flinders University's AI position statement says AI should be used responsibly, ethically, and transparently, with attention to privacy, security, stakeholder needs, and ongoing evaluation.
9+Evidence (en, f3ccd9f38fb4): We also recognise the challenges of this rapidly evolving technology and are committed to using AI in an ethical and transparent manner, consistent with our values of integrity, courage, and excellence.
10+teaching: Flinders' staff good-practice guide recommends that staff take steps to design for academic integrity and artificial intelligence.
11+Evidence (en, 2a4ce72e26a3): We recommend that you take the following steps to design for academic integrity and AI.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
Flinders' student academic integrity page states that misusing AI tools includes using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without topic coordinator permission and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Flinders provides staff with AI assessment scale template instructions that range from no AI permitted through prompted, assisted, task-completion, and full AI use, with acknowledgement expectations attached to permitted use.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Flinders University's AI position statement says AI should be used responsibly, ethically, and transparently, with attention to privacy, security, stakeholder needs, and ongoing evaluation.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Flinders' staff good-practice guide recommends that staff take steps to design for academic integrity and artificial intelligence.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
Academic integrity - Flinders University Students
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 6:42 PM
AI Assessment Scale Instruction Template examples
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 6:41 PM
Good practice guide - Designing assessment for Artificial Intelligence and academic integrity
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 6:40 PM
Position Statement of the use of Artificial Intelligence at Flinders University
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 6:43 PM