other
Emory Responsible AI guidance says users should review AI-generated content before adopting it in clinical, administrative, or organizational settings.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Emory University
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Emory University currently has 13 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 23, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 2 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
Emory University release diff
Comparing public-release-20260526-001 to public-release-20260526-003.
+6-0
11 # Emory University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+security_review: Emory Responsible AI guidance says users should use only Emory-approved secure AI tools for content workflows.
5+Evidence (en, 6ea3a3cb66bb): Use only Emory-Approved Secure AI Tools.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: Emory Responsible AI guidance says all data may only be used with AI in accordance with applicable policies, laws, and regulations.
10+Evidence (en, 5755025f9f3d): All data may only be used in accordance with applicable policies, laws, and regulations.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
Claim changes
13 claim records
academic_integrity
Emory Responsible AI guidance says AI involvement should be disclosed where relevant or required.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Emory Responsible AI guidance says users should use only Emory-approved secure AI tools for content workflows.
Review: Agent reviewed
other
Emory Responsible AI guidance says users must confirm copyrighted or licensed materials may legally be used before inputting them into AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Emory Responsible AI guidance says users should provide only the minimum necessary data to AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Emory Responsible AI guidance says all data may only be used with AI in accordance with applicable policies, laws, and regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The Emory College Honor Council AI information sheet says Emory does not currently license an AI detection program, detection tools can produce false positives or negatives, and detection results alone would not ordinarily be sufficient to find a student responsible for a violation.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Emory Responsible AI guidance says students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use because instructors may specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Emory Responsible AI guidance says AI tools that have not gone through the EASAT review process may not be suitable for handling Confidential or Restricted data, and users should consult the EASAT website for approved tools and use scope.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Emory College Learning Design guidance cites Honor Council language stating that, where AI is not allowed, using an AI program to generate assignment content constitutes plagiarism and an Honor Code violation, and unauthorized AI use may also constitute unauthorized assistance or other Honor Code violations.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
Emory maintains a public Responsible AI site that presents Emory's Responsible AI Guiding Principles, developed through multiple rounds of input from across the Emory community, with an iterative process over time.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
For the Rollins School of Public Health, the Rollins Teaching & Learning Core page says Rollins provides general generative AI guidance to help faculty and instructors develop their own course policies, and expects course policies to vary by context.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
8 source attributions
AI Content Generation & Proofing Guidelines
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 23, 2026, 6:20 PM
AI Data Security Responsibilities
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 23, 2026, 6:20 PM
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:32 AM
Artificial Intelligence: Considerations for Detection
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:32 AM
Content Generation and Proofing | Emory University | Atlanta GA
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:32 AM
Home | Emory University | Atlanta GA
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:32 AM
Technology & Evidence-Based Learning | Rollins TLC
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:32 AM
Understanding Your Data Security Responsibilities | Emory University | Atlanta GA
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 4:32 AM