Change log

Emory University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims7Sources6

University page Public JSON

Emory University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Emory University AI policy record
2+privacy: Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.
3+Evidence (en, 3a146e9c18df): Use of these public-facing AI platforms creates risks of inadvertent disclosure of Sensitive Information. To protect sensitive information, always use Emory approved AI tools.
4+academic_integrity: The Emory College Honor Council AI information sheet says Emory does not currently license an AI detection program, detection tools can produce false positives or negatives, and detection results alone would not ordinarily be sufficient to find a student responsible for a violation.
5+Evidence (en, 458f50894d97): Emory does not currently license an AI detection program. ... The results of a detection program alone would not ordinarily be sufficient to find a student responsible for a violation without the presence of other indicators.
6+teaching: Emory Responsible AI guidance says students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use because instructors may specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.
7+Evidence (en, 624af48d97d7): Academic coursework: Students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use. Many instructors specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.
8+security_review: Emory Responsible AI guidance says AI tools that have not gone through the EASAT review process may not be suitable for handling Confidential or Restricted data, and users should consult the EASAT website for approved tools and use scope.
9+Evidence (en, 3a146e9c18df): AI tools that have not gone through Emory’s EASAT review process may not be suitable for handling sensitive information such as Confidential or Restricted data.
10+academic_integrity: Emory College Learning Design guidance cites Honor Council language stating that, where AI is not allowed, using an AI program to generate assignment content constitutes plagiarism and an Honor Code violation, and unauthorized AI use may also constitute unauthorized assistance or other Honor Code violations.
11+Evidence (en, fa392e3ad928): Using an artificial intelligence program to generate any content for any assignment in this course ... constitutes plagiarism and is a violation of the Honor Code. The use of an artificial intelligence program in this course without permission from the instructor may also constitute seeking unauthorized assistance or violate other provisions of the Honor Code.
12+source_status: Emory maintains a public Responsible AI site that presents Emory's Responsible AI Guiding Principles, developed through multiple rounds of input from across the Emory community, with an iterative process over time.
13+Evidence (en, 719f36614739): This site is Emory’s home for that work. It presents Emory’s Responsible AI Guiding Principles, developed through multiple rounds of input from across the Emory community, a process that will repeat, iterate, and expand over time.
14+teaching: For the Rollins School of Public Health, the Rollins Teaching & Learning Core page says Rollins provides general generative AI guidance to help faculty and instructors develop their own course policies, and expects course policies to vary by context.
15+Evidence (en, 84cc9dfde7a0): Rollin's School of Public Health provides general guidance on generative AI to help faculty and instructors develop their own course policies. We expect that courses will vary in their specific policies depending on context.

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

The Emory College Honor Council AI information sheet says Emory does not currently license an AI detection program, detection tools can produce false positives or negatives, and detection results alone would not ordinarily be sufficient to find a student responsible for a violation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Emory Responsible AI guidance says students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use because instructors may specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Emory Responsible AI guidance says AI tools that have not gone through the EASAT review process may not be suitable for handling Confidential or Restricted data, and users should consult the EASAT website for approved tools and use scope.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Emory College Learning Design guidance cites Honor Council language stating that, where AI is not allowed, using an AI program to generate assignment content constitutes plagiarism and an Honor Code violation, and unauthorized AI use may also constitute unauthorized assistance or other Honor Code violations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Emory maintains a public Responsible AI site that presents Emory's Responsible AI Guiding Principles, developed through multiple rounds of input from across the Emory community, with an iterative process over time.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

For the Rollins School of Public Health, the Rollins Teaching & Learning Core page says Rollins provides general generative AI guidance to help faculty and instructors develop their own course policies, and expects course policies to vary by context.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen