research
UTM says GAI services beyond proofreading tools must be explicitly stated, and GAI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.
變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
6 條當前主張;2 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異,適用於 Universiti Teknologi Malaysia。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見,亦非學術誠信建議;除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁,否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目,不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變,本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄:6。
UTM says GAI services beyond proofreading tools must be explicitly stated, and GAI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.
UTM says reliable GAI tools should have data privacy management and protection systems and be safe to use.
UTM CDex lists both Malay and English versions of the generative AI teaching-and-learning guideline on its policy/handbook/procedure/guidelines page.
UTM's guideline applies to all undergraduate and postgraduate academic programmes that intend to use generative AI, and it was approved by the University Senate and effective from 27 March 2024.
UTM requires GAI use in assignments and works to be listed with developer information, tool name, version, access date, and URL when available; undisclosed use can be treated as plagiarism.
UTM requires academic staff to clearly state GAI use in course assessments, and prioritizes continuous assessments that demonstrate deep mastery.
官方來源紀錄:2。
official_policy_page 追蹤器檢查於 May 14, 2026, 2:30 PM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 14, 2026, 2:30 PM