ai_tool_treatment
For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.
變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
6 條當前主張;4 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異,適用於 Chalmers University of Technology。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見,亦非學術誠信建議;除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁,否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目,不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變,本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄:6。
For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.
For thesis work, Chalmers tells students to consult a Chalmers supervisor or relevant collaborator before using AI tools when there are uncertainties, particularly around data privacy and ethical issues.
Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.
Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.
Chalmers Library's ethical-use guidance says users should not upload sensitive or private information, copyright-protected material, or text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication to chatbots.
Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.
官方來源紀錄:4。
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 15, 2026, 3:18 AM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 15, 2026, 3:18 AM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 15, 2026, 3:17 AM
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 15, 2026, 3:17 AM