Policy presence
University of Strathclyde has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Glasgow, United Kingdom
University of Strathclyde
University of Strathclyde is listed as QS 2026 rank =251. University of Strathclyde has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Strathclyde is listed as QS 2026 rank =251. University of Strathclyde has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Strathclyde as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-strathclyde.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Strathclyde has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
University of Strathclyde has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
University of Strathclyde has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Strathclyde has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
University of Strathclyde has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
University of Strathclyde has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The University of Strathclyde Student Discipline Procedure says the University does not endorse or permit AI detection tools or services to determine whether unauthorised Generative AI use has taken place, and does not permit submitting student work to those tools or services.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_detection_tools_not_permitted_for_genai_determination
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University does not endorse or permit the use of any Artificial Intelligence detection tools or services to determine if the unauthorised use of Generative AI has taken place, and does not permit the submission of students' work to these tools or services.
Academic Integrity
The University of Strathclyde Student Discipline Procedure lists unauthorised use of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools and services as an example of behaviour that may give an unfair academic advantage.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorised_genai_academic_misconduct_example
Original evidence
Evidence 1Other behaviours that may give an unfair academic advantage, including the unauthorised use of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools and services.
Academic Integrity
University of Strathclyde guidance tells students to check module or department guidance to determine whether AI tools may be used in a specific assessment and to what extent.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_check_module_department_assessment_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students should always check with module leaders or Department teams to determine whether AI tools may be used in a given assessment, and the extent to which it is permitted to use them.
Academic Integrity
University of Strathclyde guidance says use of Gen-AI in learning and assessment is not necessarily or automatically academic misconduct; context determines whether misconduct is a concern.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_use_context_determines_misconduct_concern
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of Gen-AI in learning and assessment contexts is not necessarily or automatically academic misconduct.
Localized display only
The page adds that context of use determines whether academic misconduct is a concern.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Strathclyde guidance says the only Gen-AI tool students and staff may currently sign up to with University credentials is Microsoft Copilot in Edge, and that staff and students also have access to the in-built Zoom AI Assistant while using Zoom.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: credentialed_access_copilot_edge_zoom_ai_assistant
Original evidence
Evidence 1The only Gen-AI tool that the University currently allows staff and students to sign-up to with their University credentials is Microsoft Copilot in Edge. Staff and students will also have access to the in-built Zoom AI Assistant while using Zoom.
Privacy
University of Strathclyde guidance warns that Gen-AI tools may collect user data and tells users to read privacy policies carefully and avoid sharing personal, sensitive, or copyright-protected information with Gen-AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: read privacy policies and avoid personal, sensitive, or copyright-protected information in Gen-AI tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Gen-AI tools may collect user data. Read privacy policies carefully and avoid sharing Personal, sensitive or copyright protected information.
Localized display only
The same paragraph also warns against giving tools access to restricted or copyright protected University materials.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Student Discipline Procedure: Academic Misconduct
strath.ac.uk
Use of Gen-AI in learning & assessment
strath.ac.uk
Using Gen-AI in coursework and Assessment
guides.lib.strath.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.