Southampton, United Kingdom Last checked

University of Southampton

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Check the applicable scope

Use GenAI for learning support only within module instructions; do not submit AI-authored material as your own.

Official source ↗

Exams

Check the applicable scope

The 2026–27 conduct rules address unauthorised AI-generated or altered academic work. Check the instructions for your specific exam; no general AI permission follows.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Check the applicable scope

Check the module-specific declaration template and acknowledge GenAI when required.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Check the applicable scope

The Library asks you to check whether inputs become training data and whether you hold the necessary copyright. Tool-specific retention and upload permissions remain unconfirmed.

Official source ↗

Tools and eligibility

Check the applicable scope

The University guidance mentions Copilot access through Microsoft 365, not blanket assessment approval.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Check the applicable scope

AI research involving human participants or their data falls within research ethics policy. Researchers must not use AI to support peer review without explicit permission.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Check the applicable scope

Unauthorised AI-generated or altered academic work may breach the academic conduct regulations.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Check the applicable scope

Module staff determine permitted uses and may request a declaration.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Check the applicable scope

No independently verified institutional GenAI procurement approval or tool-specific retention controls are established here.

Before you submit

Do

  • Confirm the module tutor’s instructions before using AI.
    Source guidance
  • Check whether an AI use declaration is required.
    Source guidance
  • Check copyright and privacy before uploading material.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not ask GenAI to write or rewrite assessed work for you.
    Site advice
  • Do not upload module tutor materials to GenAI tools.
    Site advice
  • Do not treat Office 365 Copilot access as examination permission.
    Site advice

AI use questioned?

University of Southampton

Student and module instructions; research ethics and peer review have separate rules. Microsoft account access is not assessment permission.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Tool discovery records: scope pending review

Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.

ChatGPT

Copilot

Microsoft Copilot

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 3

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  3. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

6

Historical and pending public Claims (2)

These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.

cl-university-of-southampton-chatgpt-348 · excluded_pending_review

Student and module instructions; research ethics and peer review have separate rules. Microsoft account access is not assessment permission.

Original canonical record retained. Research classification is not current policy or publication approval; non-VERIFIED originals are excluded from current conclusions.

Record history

cl-university-of-southampton-microsoft-copilot-349 · excluded_pending_review

Student and module instructions; research ethics and peer review have separate rules. Microsoft account access is not assessment permission.

Original canonical record retained. Research classification is not current policy or publication approval; non-VERIFIED originals are excluded from current conclusions.

Record history

Official sources

2 official URLs; 3 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

GenAI - Searching and Generative AI (GenAI) - LibGuides@Southampton at University of Southampton Library

library.soton.ac.uk

University official source

library.soton.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

GenAI - Searching and Generative AI (GenAI) - LibGuides@Southampton at University of Southampton Library · 2026-05-13T14:06:05Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

3f3bfaa78236641ef0c9c481e9a922e9aefc6cdc104c6017764370b22805ecf4

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Using generative artificial intelligence during your studies | University of Southampton

www.southampton.ac.uk

University official source

southampton.ac.uk

Hash and captured version

Using generative artificial intelligence during your studies | University of Southampton · 2026-05-13T14:05:00Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

92bf7b3a10035a5b5aee80e011e9ac87d4b9bac923d9c7dcc486b6d034798625

Using generative artificial intelligence during your studies | University of Southampton · 2026-07-15T23:08:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

6caa1f010a31f49907a4dc02eda1c8e2b1cd84721742507198288369be245cf9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
qs71-90-v6-completeness-r3-20261025
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · All record history

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Policy semantics PARTIAL; raw official HTML/PDF originals unavailable. New presentation evidence is pending independent acceptance.
  • All original public tool records remain discovery only; account, price and assessment permission require confirmation.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Use GenAI for learning support only within module instructions; do not submit AI-authored material as your own.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        Check the module-specific declaration template and acknowledge GenAI when required.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        The Library asks you to check whether inputs become training data and whether you hold the necessary copyright. Tool-specific retention and upload permissions remain unconfirmed.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        The University guidance mentions Copilot access through Microsoft 365, not blanket assessment approval.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        The 2026–27 conduct rules address unauthorised AI-generated or altered academic work. Check the instructions for your specific exam; no general AI permission follows.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        AI research involving human participants or their data falls within research ethics policy. Researchers must not use AI to support peer review without explicit permission.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Unauthorised AI-generated or altered academic work may breach the academic conduct regulations.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Module staff determine permitted uses and may request a declaration.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        No independently verified institutional GenAI procurement approval or tool-specific retention controls are established here.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        8 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →
        University of Southampton AI Policy