Policy presence
University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Boulder, United States
University of Colorado Boulder
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Academic integrity
University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
University of Colorado Boulder has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of Colorado Boulder has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Security Review
CU Boulder OIT states that AI tools and integrations are evaluated through the Information Technology Accessibility and Security Review Process and that tools or services not completing campus review breach campus guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tools_require_ict_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1CU Boulder requires that accessibility and security compliance provisions be included in all contracts or user agreements. AI tools and integrations are evaluated by CU Boulder’s Information Technology Accessibility and Security Review Process, also known as the ICT Review Process. The ICT Review Process applies to purchases and adoptions of all information technology regardless of the cost or funding source. The use of tools and services that have not completed the campus review is considered a breach of campus guidelines.
Teaching
CU Boulder Center for Teaching & Learning identifies generative AI as raising teaching questions about assessment design, classroom AI-use expectations, AI literacy, and ethical awareness.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_guidance_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative AI has introduced new considerations and challenges for educators. It raises important questions about how to design valid assessments of student learning, how to communicate expectations around appropriate AI use in the classroom, and how to support students in developing AI literacy and ethical awareness.
Academic Integrity
CU Boulder Center for Teaching & Learning provides instructor-facing guidance on how generative AI complicates academic integrity and how instructors can address misconduct while supporting learning, fairness, and trust.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_academic_integrity_guidance_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1The proliferation of generative AI technologies has blurred the boundaries between original, assisted and unauthorized work, complicating how academic integrity is maintained in higher education. This guide synthesizes research and institutional practices to help instructors understand how AI may be reshaping student approaches to academic work and integrity, why students engage in misconduct, and how instructors can address misconduct in a way that supports learning, fairness and trust.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
AI & Academic Integrity
colorado.edu
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool Review and Approval
colorado.edu
Teaching, Learning, & AI
colorado.edu