{"apiVersion":"v1","generatedAt":"2026-05-16T15:20:21.699Z","canonicalUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-colorado-boulder","license":"CC-BY-4.0","trackerMetadataLicense":"CC-BY-4.0","sourcePolicy":"Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.","sourceRightsPolicy":"Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.","limitations":["Policy analysis profiles are deterministic summaries of public tracker claims and are not final policy conclusions.","Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage; it is not a policy quality score, strictness score, legal adequacy score, safety score, or institutional compliance score.","This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page."],"citation":{"citationTitle":"University of Colorado Boulder policy analysis profile","canonicalUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-colorado-boulder","publicJsonUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/analysis/universities/university-of-colorado-boulder.json","suggestedCitation":"University AI Policy Tracker. \"University of Colorado Boulder policy analysis profile.\" Version v1. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-colorado-boulder","sourceRightsPolicy":"Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms."},"data":{"schemaVersion":"uapt-policy-analysis-v1","apiVersion":"v1","entityType":"university","entitySlug":"university-of-colorado-boulder","entityName":"University of Colorado Boulder","canonicalUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-colorado-boulder","publicJsonUrl":"https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/analysis/universities/university-of-colorado-boulder.json","generatedAt":"2026-05-16T05:08:10.000Z","basedOnClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity","claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review","claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations"],"basedOnSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","https://www.colorado.edu/information-technology/ai-cu-boulder/ai-tools-list/artificial-intelligence-ai-tool-review-and-approval"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.775,"coverageScore":{"score":85,"maxScore":100,"label":"broad_public_coverage","components":[{"key":"policy_presence","label":"Central AI policy or guidance source exists","points":15,"maxPoints":15,"status":"unclear","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"academic_integrity","label":"Academic integrity guidance","points":15,"maxPoints":15,"status":"conditionally_allowed","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"ai_disclosure","label":"AI disclosure guidance","points":0,"maxPoints":15,"status":"not_mentioned","evidenceClaimIds":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"coursework","label":"Coursework guidance","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"conditionally_allowed","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"exams","label":"Exam or assessment guidance","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"conditionally_allowed","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"privacy_data_entry","label":"Privacy or data-entry guidance","points":15,"maxPoints":15,"status":"conditionally_allowed","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"approved_tools","label":"Approved tools, procurement, or licensed tools","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"allowed","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"},{"key":"teaching_guidance","label":"Teaching or research guidance","points":10,"maxPoints":10,"status":"recommended","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate"}],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","limitations":["Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage; it is not a policy quality score.","This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page."]},"dimensions":[{"key":"policy_presence","label":"Policy presence","status":"unclear","normalizedValue":"teaching_guidance_available","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.","explanation":"Whether the public record contains official AI policy or guidance sources. This unclear status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 2 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.761,"evidenceCount":2,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"Generative AI has introduced new considerations and challenges for educators. It raises important questions about how to design valid assessments of student learning, how to communicate expectations around appropriate AI use in the classroom, and how to support students in developing AI literacy and ethical awareness.","sourceSnapshotHash":"39ba7d5c389215202b43f06822b453874217208dee5b410b95cba0f7d4a84e4d","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"The proliferation of generative AI technologies has blurred the boundaries between original, assisted and unauthorized work, complicating how academic integrity is maintained in higher education. This guide synthesizes research and institutional practices to help instructors understand how AI may be reshaping student approaches to academic work and integrity, why students engage in misconduct, and how instructors can address misconduct in a way that supports learning, fairness and trust.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7fb9697d2efc1c8059c06eb09d7ece4c32f837368795429b18dd0c807773f993","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"ai_disclosure","label":"AI disclosure","status":"not_mentioned","summary":"No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.","explanation":"This is an absence-of-evidence marker for the current tracker profile, not proof that no such policy exists.","evidenceClaimIds":[],"evidenceSourceUrls":[],"sourceLanguages":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0,"evidenceCount":0,"sourceCount":0,"notMentionedReason":"The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.","basis":[]},{"key":"coursework","label":"Coursework","status":"conditionally_allowed","normalizedValue":"teaching_guidance_available","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses coursework, assignments, syllabi, papers, homework, or submitted work. This conditionally_allowed status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 2 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.761,"evidenceCount":2,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"Generative AI has introduced new considerations and challenges for educators. It raises important questions about how to design valid assessments of student learning, how to communicate expectations around appropriate AI use in the classroom, and how to support students in developing AI literacy and ethical awareness.","sourceSnapshotHash":"39ba7d5c389215202b43f06822b453874217208dee5b410b95cba0f7d4a84e4d","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"The proliferation of generative AI technologies has blurred the boundaries between original, assisted and unauthorized work, complicating how academic integrity is maintained in higher education. This guide synthesizes research and institutional practices to help instructors understand how AI may be reshaping student approaches to academic work and integrity, why students engage in misconduct, and how instructors can address misconduct in a way that supports learning, fairness and trust.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7fb9697d2efc1c8059c06eb09d7ece4c32f837368795429b18dd0c807773f993","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"exams","label":"Exams","status":"conditionally_allowed","normalizedValue":"teaching_guidance_available","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions. This conditionally_allowed status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 2 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.761,"evidenceCount":2,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"Generative AI has introduced new considerations and challenges for educators. It raises important questions about how to design valid assessments of student learning, how to communicate expectations around appropriate AI use in the classroom, and how to support students in developing AI literacy and ethical awareness.","sourceSnapshotHash":"39ba7d5c389215202b43f06822b453874217208dee5b410b95cba0f7d4a84e4d","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"The proliferation of generative AI technologies has blurred the boundaries between original, assisted and unauthorized work, complicating how academic integrity is maintained in higher education. This guide synthesizes research and institutional practices to help instructors understand how AI may be reshaping student approaches to academic work and integrity, why students engage in misconduct, and how instructors can address misconduct in a way that supports learning, fairness and trust.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7fb9697d2efc1c8059c06eb09d7ece4c32f837368795429b18dd0c807773f993","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"privacy_data_entry","label":"Privacy and data entry","status":"conditionally_allowed","normalizedValue":"teaching_guidance_available","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools. This conditionally_allowed status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 2 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.761,"evidenceCount":2,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"Generative AI has introduced new considerations and challenges for educators. It raises important questions about how to design valid assessments of student learning, how to communicate expectations around appropriate AI use in the classroom, and how to support students in developing AI literacy and ethical awareness.","sourceSnapshotHash":"39ba7d5c389215202b43f06822b453874217208dee5b410b95cba0f7d4a84e4d","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"The proliferation of generative AI technologies has blurred the boundaries between original, assisted and unauthorized work, complicating how academic integrity is maintained in higher education. This guide synthesizes research and institutional practices to help instructors understand how AI may be reshaping student approaches to academic work and integrity, why students engage in misconduct, and how instructors can address misconduct in a way that supports learning, fairness and trust.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7fb9697d2efc1c8059c06eb09d7ece4c32f837368795429b18dd0c807773f993","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"academic_integrity","label":"Academic integrity","status":"conditionally_allowed","normalizedValue":"ai_tools_require_ict_review","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.","explanation":"Whether public guidance connects AI use to academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules. This conditionally_allowed status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 2 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","https://www.colorado.edu/information-technology/ai-cu-boulder/ai-tools-list/artificial-intelligence-ai-tool-review-and-approval"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.782,"evidenceCount":2,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/information-technology/ai-cu-boulder/ai-tools-list/artificial-intelligence-ai-tool-review-and-approval","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"CU Boulder requires that accessibility and security compliance provisions be included in all contracts or user agreements. AI tools and integrations are evaluated by CU Boulder’s Information Technology Accessibility and Security Review Process, also known as the ICT Review Process. The ICT Review Process applies to purchases and adoptions of all information technology regardless of the cost or funding source. The use of tools and services that have not completed the campus review is considered a breach of campus guidelines.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7df157eaf672b2311ededb8df617f87d155de9305a336defbc25a903e283502a","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"The proliferation of generative AI technologies has blurred the boundaries between original, assisted and unauthorized work, complicating how academic integrity is maintained in higher education. This guide synthesizes research and institutional practices to help instructors understand how AI may be reshaping student approaches to academic work and integrity, why students engage in misconduct, and how instructors can address misconduct in a way that supports learning, fairness and trust.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7fb9697d2efc1c8059c06eb09d7ece4c32f837368795429b18dd0c807773f993","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"approved_tools","label":"Approved tools","status":"allowed","normalizedValue":"ai_tools_require_ict_review","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.","explanation":"Whether public guidance identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools. This allowed status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 1 supporting public claim. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/information-technology/ai-cu-boulder/ai-tools-list/artificial-intelligence-ai-tool-review-and-approval"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.808,"evidenceCount":1,"sourceCount":1,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/information-technology/ai-cu-boulder/ai-tools-list/artificial-intelligence-ai-tool-review-and-approval","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"CU Boulder requires that accessibility and security compliance provisions be included in all contracts or user agreements. AI tools and integrations are evaluated by CU Boulder’s Information Technology Accessibility and Security Review Process, also known as the ICT Review Process. The ICT Review Process applies to purchases and adoptions of all information technology regardless of the cost or funding source. The use of tools and services that have not completed the campus review is considered a breach of campus guidelines.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7df157eaf672b2311ededb8df617f87d155de9305a336defbc25a903e283502a","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"named_ai_services","label":"Named AI services","status":"not_mentioned","summary":"No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.","explanation":"This is an absence-of-evidence marker for the current tracker profile, not proof that no such policy exists.","evidenceClaimIds":[],"evidenceSourceUrls":[],"sourceLanguages":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0,"evidenceCount":0,"sourceCount":0,"notMentionedReason":"The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.","basis":[]},{"key":"teaching_guidance","label":"Teaching guidance","status":"recommended","normalizedValue":"teaching_guidance_available","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses instructors, teaching, classroom policy, assessment design, or syllabus language. This recommended status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 2 supporting public claims. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.761,"evidenceCount":2,"sourceCount":2,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-teaching-ai-considerations","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"Generative AI has introduced new considerations and challenges for educators. It raises important questions about how to design valid assessments of student learning, how to communicate expectations around appropriate AI use in the classroom, and how to support students in developing AI literacy and ethical awareness.","sourceSnapshotHash":"39ba7d5c389215202b43f06822b453874217208dee5b410b95cba0f7d4a84e4d","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"},{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-academic-integrity","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/technology-ai/teaching-learning-ai/ai-academic-integrity","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"The proliferation of generative AI technologies has blurred the boundaries between original, assisted and unauthorized work, complicating how academic integrity is maintained in higher education. This guide synthesizes research and institutional practices to help instructors understand how AI may be reshaping student approaches to academic work and integrity, why students engage in misconduct, and how instructors can address misconduct in a way that supports learning, fairness and trust.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7fb9697d2efc1c8059c06eb09d7ece4c32f837368795429b18dd0c807773f993","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]},{"key":"research_guidance","label":"Research guidance","status":"not_mentioned","summary":"No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.","explanation":"This is an absence-of-evidence marker for the current tracker profile, not proof that no such policy exists.","evidenceClaimIds":[],"evidenceSourceUrls":[],"sourceLanguages":[],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0,"evidenceCount":0,"sourceCount":0,"notMentionedReason":"The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.","basis":[]},{"key":"security_procurement","label":"Security and procurement","status":"required","normalizedValue":"ai_tools_require_ict_review","summary":"University of Colorado Boulder has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.","explanation":"Whether public guidance addresses security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or licensing. This required status was derived from claim type, normalized value, and keyword rules over 1 supporting public claim. Review the basis array before reusing this as a policy conclusion.","evidenceClaimIds":["claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review"],"evidenceSourceUrls":["https://www.colorado.edu/information-technology/ai-cu-boulder/ai-tools-list/artificial-intelligence-ai-tool-review-and-approval"],"sourceLanguages":["en"],"reviewState":"machine_candidate","confidence":0.808,"evidenceCount":1,"sourceCount":1,"basis":[{"claimId":"claim-cuboulder-ai-tool-review","sourceUrl":"https://www.colorado.edu/information-technology/ai-cu-boulder/ai-tools-list/artificial-intelligence-ai-tool-review-and-approval","sourceLanguage":"en","evidenceSnippet":"CU Boulder requires that accessibility and security compliance provisions be included in all contracts or user agreements. AI tools and integrations are evaluated by CU Boulder’s Information Technology Accessibility and Security Review Process, also known as the ICT Review Process. The ICT Review Process applies to purchases and adoptions of all information technology regardless of the cost or funding source. The use of tools and services that have not completed the campus review is considered a breach of campus guidelines.","sourceSnapshotHash":"7df157eaf672b2311ededb8df617f87d155de9305a336defbc25a903e283502a","reviewState":"agent_reviewed"}]}],"limitations":["Policy analysis profiles are deterministic summaries of public tracker claims and are not final policy conclusions.","Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage; it is not a policy quality score, strictness score, legal adequacy score, safety score, or institutional compliance score.","This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page."],"suggestedCitation":"University AI Policy Tracker. \"University of Colorado Boulder policy analysis profile.\" Version v1. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-colorado-boulder"}}