Policy presence
University of California, Irvine has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Irvine, United States
University of California, Irvine
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of California, Irvine has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of California, Irvine has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of California, Irvine has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of California, Irvine has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of California, Irvine has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of California, Irvine has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
University of California, Irvine has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
Teaching guidance
University of California, Irvine has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of California, Irvine has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UCI Information Security lists UCI ZotGPT Chat, UCI Microsoft Copilot Chat, and UCI Google Gemini as appropriate for P1, P2, and P3 data, while non-UCI ChatGPT, non-UCI Copilot, and non-UCI Gemini are listed for P1 data only.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UCI-supported chatbot services: P1-P3; non-UCI public chatbot services: P1 only.
Original evidence
Evidence 1UCI ZotGPT Chat | P1, P2, P3; UCI Microsoft Copilot Chat | P1, P2, P3; UCI Google Gemini | P1, P2, P3; OpenAI ChatGPT | P1; Microsoft Copilot (Non-UCI) | P1; Google Gemini (Non-UCI) | P1.
Security Review
UCI Information Security says AI chatbot services involving third-party access to University information need approved-vendor and use-case review for security, privacy, legal, and risk before use, and that high-risk use cases need contracts including UC Appendix DS.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Third-party AI chatbot use with University information needs supplier/use-case review; high-risk uses need UC Appendix DS contracts.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any software or service where a third-party supplier has access to University information needs to be reviewed as an approved vendor and use case for security, privacy, legal, and risk. Before using AI chatbot services, review the data that will be submitted to the chatbot. High risk use cases (see below) must have contracts that include UC Appendix DS.
Academic Integrity
UCI's Office of Academic Integrity and Student Conduct lists using work created by ChatGPT without appropriate citation and representing artificially produced text as one's own language as examples of plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Uncited ChatGPT-created work and artificially produced text represented as one's own are plagiarism examples.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Examples of Plagiarism include but are not limited to: Using work created by ChatGPT and failing to include appropriate citation. Representing artificially-produced text as if it were your own language in writing. Plagiarism occurs when you submit an assignment, a part of an assignment, or a creative work as your own when it was originally created by someone else or by generative AI.
Teaching
UC Irvine DTEI states that undergraduate course syllabi now need a clear statement addressing generative AI tools, and that graduate course syllabi need a course policy on student use of generative AI effective February 12, 2026; it also states there is no single campuswide policy governing student use of generative AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Course-level generative AI syllabus policies required; no single campuswide student-use policy stated.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Recent guidance from the UC Irvine Academic Senate, through the Council on Educational Policy, now requires that all undergraduate course syllabi include a clear statement addressing the use of generative AI tools. In parallel, the Graduate Council established the following policy (effective February 12, 2026): All graduate course syllabi must include a policy on student use of generative AI in that course. There is no single campuswide policy governing student use of generative AI.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
Academic Integrity
conduct.uci.edu
Syllabus
dtei.uci.edu
Use Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Securely
security.uci.edu