University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Nancy, France

Université de Lorraine

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 751-760UpdatedMay 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

3 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Universite de Lorraine's 2025 exam charter states that use of tools, including generative artificial intelligence, is fraud when it is not explicitly authorized.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: unauthorized_generative_ai_tools_constitute_exam_fraud

Last checked
May 19, 2026
Last changed
May 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L'utilisation d'outils, notamment d'intelligence artificielle generative, non explicitement autorisee constitue une fraude.

Localized display only

Use of tools, including generative AI, that is not explicitly authorized constitutes fraud.

Source language
Français (fr)
Snapshot hash
a0e4eeda…
Retrieved
May 19, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 5 - Fraude - Plagiat, page 4 of PDF text extraction

Ai Tool Treatment

For the Master Urbanisme et Amenagement, parcours Intelligence Territoriale, the SHS Metz AI-use charter requires students to clearly indicate any AI use in submitted work and provide an AI-use declaration in an appendix.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: program_ai_use_must_be_disclosed_with_appendix_declaration

Last checked
May 19, 2026
Last changed
May 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Tout usage d'IA dans un travail doit etre clairement indique dans le document rendu, selon les modalites suivantes : Dans le corps du texte : Mentionner explicitement les passages ou elements generes ou modifies par l'IA. En annexe : Fournir une declaration d'usage de l'IA.

Localized display only

Any AI use in submitted work must be clearly indicated, including explicit marking in the text and an AI-use declaration in an appendix.

Source language
Français (fr)
Snapshot hash
577e3aed…
Retrieved
May 19, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 3.a Transparence absolue

Teaching

Universite de Lorraine DACIP teaching guidance recommends favoring sovereign and secure generative AI, training on ethical issues, and transparency with students in pedagogical and assessment processes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: teaching_guidance_recommends_secure_sovereign_iag_training_and_transparency

Last checked
May 19, 2026
Last changed
May 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Recommandations des expert-es : Favoriser une IAG souveraine et securisee plutot qu'un outil externe qui peut aller a l'encontre des obligations professionnelles de l'enseignant-e entre autres en termes de respect du RGPD ; Se former aux enjeux deontologiques specifiques aux usages des technologies, dont les systemes d'IAG ; Etre transparent-e vis-a-vis des etudiant-es dans les processus pedagogiques et d'evaluation afin de soutenir leurs apprentissages.

Localized display only

Expert recommendations favor sovereign and secure generative AI, training on ethical issues, and transparency with students in pedagogical and assessment processes.

Source language
Français (fr)
Snapshot hash
91d9e8ff…
Retrieved
May 19, 2026
Evidence locator
Recommendations des expert-es, situation enseignement

Source record

Official sources

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence96%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Université de Lorraine AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universite-de-lorraine

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log