Policy presence
Universität Konstanz has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Konstanz, Germany
Universität Konstanz
Universität Konstanz is listed as QS 2026 rank =440. Universität Konstanz has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Universität Konstanz is listed as QS 2026 rank =440. Universität Konstanz has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universität Konstanz as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-konstanz.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universität Konstanz has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Universität Konstanz has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Universität Konstanz has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Universität Konstanz has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Universität Konstanz has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Universität Konstanz has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Universität Konstanz has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Universität Konstanz has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
The guidance states that if active use of an AI tool in a course requires registration with personal data, that use must be voluntary because GDPR must be observed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tool_registration_personal_data_must_be_voluntary_in_courses
Original evidence
Evidence 1Falls für die aktive Nutzung eines KI-Tools im Rahmen von Lehrveranstaltungen eine Registrierung mit Eingabe persönlicher Daten notwendig ist, muss dies für alle Veranstaltungsteilnehmer:innen freiwillig sein, da die Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung eingehalten werden muss.
Localized display only
The page says registration with personal data for active course use of AI tools must be voluntary because GDPR must be observed.
Teaching
The central guidance recommends that instructors formulate clear course guidelines governing generative AI use and discuss them with students.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: instructors_recommended_to_set_course_ai_guidelines
Original evidence
Evidence 1Wir empfehlen Ihnen, für Ihre Lehrveranstaltung klare Richtlinien zu formulieren, die auch die Nutzung von generativer KI begründet und regelt. Es ist sinnvoll, diese Richtlinien gemeinsam mit Ihren Studierenden direkt in der Lehrveranstaltung zu besprechen.
Localized display only
The source recommends clear course guidelines that regulate generative AI use and says they should be discussed with students.
Academic Integrity
For study or examination work, the guidance says instructors must state in writing which aids are permitted and that unauthorized aids, including AI where not allowed, are assessed through the usual deception framework.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: allowed_aids_must_be_communicated_for_assessment_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Versuchen Studierende, das Ergebnis einer Prüfungs- oder Studienleistung durch Täuschung (z. B. Plagiat) oder Benutzung nicht zugelassener Hilfsmittel zu beeinflussen, gilt die betreffende Prüfungs- bzw. Studienleistung als mit „nicht ausreichend“ (5,0) bewertet. Zu klären ist bei Prüfungs- und Studienleistungen somit, ob KI ein zugelassenes Hilfsmittel ist oder nicht. Lehrende müssen mit den Informationen zur Prüfungs- und Studienleistung schriftlich bekannt geben, welche Hilfsmittel erlaubt sind.
Localized display only
The source ties unauthorized aids to the deception framework and says teachers must state in writing which aids are allowed.
Ai Tool Treatment
KIM identifies Chat AI via Academic Cloud as an AI chat service available to university members in Germany through federated login and presents internally hosted models as suitable for sensitive data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: chat_ai_academic_cloud_service_available_and_privacy_oriented
Original evidence
Evidence 1Mit Chat AI bietet die GWDG Hochschulangehörigen an Universitäten in Deutschland einen sicheren und intuitiv nutzbaren KI-Chatdienst. Der Zugang erfolgt über die Academic Cloud. Nutzen Sie bitte die föderierte Anmeldung, um sich mit Ihrem Uni-Account für den Dienst anzumelden.
Localized display only
KIM says Chat AI is offered to university members in Germany through Academic Cloud and federated login with the university account.
Teaching
The Schreibzentrum guidance says AI writing tools can be used across writing steps, but users must critically reflect on them, adapt use to context, and remain responsible for resulting text.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: writing_center_ai_tools_contextual_reflective_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1KI-Werkzeuge sind mittlerweile in viele Schreibprozesse integriert. Das kann der kognitiven Entlastung dienen – jedoch nur, wenn Schreibenden bewusst ist, welche Aufgaben sie auslagern können, wo sie kritisch prüfen müssen und dass sie selbst immer die Verantwortung für entstehende Textteile übernehmen.
Localized display only
The writing center says AI tools can relieve cognitive load only when writers know what they outsource, critically check results, and remain responsible.
Source Status
Universität Konstanz has public central AI-in-teaching guidance, but the collected official sources should be treated as guidance and resource pages rather than a staged canonical finding of a formal university-wide binding AI policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_guidance_not_formal_policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Diese Seite basiert auf diesem Papier und den dazu in den Gremien gegebenen Empfehlungen sowie auf Rückmeldungen aus den Fachbereichen. Sie unterstützt im Auftrag des Prorektors für Lehre die Lehrenden an der Universität Konstanz dabei, Leitlinien für ihre eigenen Veranstaltungen zu entwickeln.
Localized display only
The central page says it is based on a paper and committee recommendations and supports teachers in developing guidelines for their own courses.
Academic Integrity
The central examination-office page lists KI-related self-declaration forms for multiple bachelor and master thesis contexts and links good-scientific-practice materials.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_exam_page_lists_ai_related_thesis_declarations
Original evidence
Evidence 1Erklärungen zum eigenständigen Abfassen von Bachelorarbeiten ... Erklärung zum eigenständigen Abfassen von Bachelorarbeiten (B.A. und B.Ed. Geschichte und Soziologie) ... KI
Localized display only
The examination-office page lists self-declaration forms for bachelor theses, including KI-specific files for some programs.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Bachelor, Master, Magister | Zentrales Prüfungsamt | Universität Konstanz
uni-konstanz.de
KI im KIM | Services | Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
kim.uni-konstanz.de
KI in der Lehre | Weiterentwicklung der Lehre | Universität Konstanz
uni-konstanz.de
Schreiben und KI | Schreibzentrum | Universität Konstanz
uni-konstanz.de
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.