Raleigh, United States

North Carolina State University

North Carolina State University is listed as QS 2026 rank =272. North Carolina State University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

North Carolina State University is listed as QS 2026 rank =272. North Carolina State University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists North Carolina State University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/north-carolina-state-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage6 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/north-carolina-state-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Procurement claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources4

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score70/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

North Carolina State University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence76%Evidence1Sources1

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

NC State guidance says NC State credentials must be used for approved AI tools and personal accounts are not allowed to be used with university data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ncsu_credentials_required_for_approved_ai_tools_with_university_data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
NC State credentials must be used for all approved AI tools; personal accounts are not allowed to be used with university data.

Procurement

NC State guidance says several AI tools are available for use with university data at approved sensitivity levels, and use of university data with unapproved AI tools requires an IT Purchase Compliance request.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: unapproved_ai_tools_with_university_data_require_itpc_request

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Several AI Tools are now available for use with green (not sensitive), yellow (moderately sensitive) and red (highly sensitive) data campus-wide. Use of University Data with unapproved AI tools requires an IT Purchase Compliance (ITPC) request.

Research

NC State research AI guidance says researchers must handle data used with AI responsibly under applicable privacy laws, university policies, and NC State data management regulation, and AI use for research with specific compliance control plans needs approval before use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: research_ai_data_privacy_and_compliance_approval

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Researchers must handle data used with AI research responsibly, adhering to all applicable privacy laws, university policies, and REG 08.00.03 - Data Management Regulation. ... For research that has specific compliance control plans, use of AI and the specific tools to be used need to be approved before use.

Ai Tool Treatment

NC State Software Licensing publishes an approved AI solutions list that records AI products and the highest NC State data sensitivity classification approved for each listed use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: approved_ai_solutions_list_with_data_color

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Approved AI Solutions ... Data Color - Approved Up To ... Zoom AI Companion Tools ... Entire Campus ... Yellow (Moderately Sensitive) ... NotebookLM ... Entire Campus ... Yellow (Moderately Sensitive) ... Gemini Chat within NCSU Account ... Entire Campus ... Yellow (Moderately Sensitive).

Research

NC State research AI guidance says researchers must safeguard their own intellectual property and avoid violating others' IP rights when using generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: researchers_must_safeguard_ip_when_using_generative_ai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Researchers must safeguard their own intellectual property (IP) and ensure they do not violate the IP rights of others when using Generative AI.

Teaching

NC State DELTA teaching guidance advises instructors to specify course- and assignment-level AI expectations, and states that as of July 2025 there is no official university policy regarding AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: instructor_ai_guidelines_advised_no_official_ai_use_policy_as_of_2025_07

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Whether you design the policy or students design the policy, clearly specify how AI may or may not be used in coursework, assignments, and assessments. ... As of July 2025, there is no official university policy regarding AI use.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities