Policy presence
North Carolina State University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Raleigh, United States
North Carolina State University is listed as QS 2026 rank =272. North Carolina State University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
North Carolina State University is listed as QS 2026 rank =272. North Carolina State University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists North Carolina State University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/north-carolina-state-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
North Carolina State University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
North Carolina State University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
North Carolina State University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
North Carolina State University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
North Carolina State University has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
North Carolina State University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
North Carolina State University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
North Carolina State University has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
North Carolina State University has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: ncsu_credentials_required_for_approved_ai_tools_with_university_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1NC State credentials must be used for all approved AI tools; personal accounts are not allowed to be used with university data.
Procurement
Normalized value: unapproved_ai_tools_with_university_data_require_itpc_request
Original evidence
Evidence 1Several AI Tools are now available for use with green (not sensitive), yellow (moderately sensitive) and red (highly sensitive) data campus-wide. Use of University Data with unapproved AI tools requires an IT Purchase Compliance (ITPC) request.
Research
Normalized value: research_ai_data_privacy_and_compliance_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers must handle data used with AI research responsibly, adhering to all applicable privacy laws, university policies, and REG 08.00.03 - Data Management Regulation. ... For research that has specific compliance control plans, use of AI and the specific tools to be used need to be approved before use.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: approved_ai_solutions_list_with_data_color
Original evidence
Evidence 1Approved AI Solutions ... Data Color - Approved Up To ... Zoom AI Companion Tools ... Entire Campus ... Yellow (Moderately Sensitive) ... NotebookLM ... Entire Campus ... Yellow (Moderately Sensitive) ... Gemini Chat within NCSU Account ... Entire Campus ... Yellow (Moderately Sensitive).
Research
Normalized value: researchers_must_safeguard_ip_when_using_generative_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers must safeguard their own intellectual property (IP) and ensure they do not violate the IP rights of others when using Generative AI.
Teaching
Normalized value: instructor_ai_guidelines_advised_no_official_ai_use_policy_as_of_2025_07
Original evidence
Evidence 1Whether you design the policy or students design the policy, clearly specify how AI may or may not be used in coursework, assignments, and assessments. ... As of July 2025, there is no official university policy regarding AI use.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
4 source attribution
ai.ncsu.edu
software.ncsu.edu
teaching-resources.delta.ncsu.edu
ai.ncsu.edu
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.