Moscow, Russia

National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage2 reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2Source languageruPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/national-research-nuclear-university-mephi-moscow-engineering-physics-institute.json

Policy profile

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence67%

Policy presence

National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence65%Evidence1Sources1

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

MEPhI lists a 2026 professional-development programme for school teachers and education administrators on AI tools, lesson-material creation, checking assignments, detecting signs of AI use, and legal foundations of AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: ai professional development for school teachers and administrators

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Вы научитесь использовать различные инструменты ИИ, такие как DeepSeek, Qwen.ai, Алиса, GigaChat, Kandinsky, Mega.Space, 300.ya.ru, Riverside для подготовки уроков, презентаций, тестов, проверки домашних заданий и др. Кроме того, будут рассмотрены правовые основы использования ИИ.

Localized display only

The programme says participants will learn to use AI tools for lesson preparation, presentations, tests and homework checking, and that legal foundations of AI use will be considered.

Teaching

In an official April 2026 MEPhI news item, Rector Vladimir Shevchenko framed generative AI as a challenge to text- and code-based assessment and pointed to personal professor-student communication as a response; this is rector commentary, not a binding university policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence76%

Normalized value: official rector commentary on AI and assessment

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Отдельно ректор остановился на кризисе систем контроля знаний. По его словам, домашние эссе и написание кода как формы проверки «умерли»: нейросети делают это быстрее и качественнее, пусть и без понимания того, чем занимаются. Выход Владимир Шевченко видит в возврате к личной коммуникации профессора и студента

Localized display only

The rector said homework essays and coding as checks of knowledge have 'died' because neural networks can do them faster and better, and he saw the way out in personal professor-student communication.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Владимир Шевченко: «Мы не должны оценивать тексты, мы должны оценивать ученика»

mephi.ru

Snapshot hash
21ac35dfecbfe5061564aace9e7a52a2cebf963409b73a7d451551882683cee0

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities