Policy presence
Kaohsiung Medical University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Medical University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Kaohsiung Medical University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Kaohsiung Medical University
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: student_genai_prohibited_plagiarism_cheating_privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1學生不得使用生成式 AI 工具從事下列行為:1. 抄襲或代寫;2. 考試作弊;3. 隱私洩露:學生應避免將個人或他人隱私資訊輸入至生成式 AI 工具。
Localized display only
Students must not use generative AI tools for plagiarism or ghostwriting, exam cheating, or privacy leakage.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: student_genai_allowed_learning_aid
Original evidence
Evidence 1學生可以妥善使用生成式 AI 工具輔助學習:1. 提升學生自主學習;2. 潤飾文字;3. 語言與寫作輔助;4. 增進思辨能力;5. 提供靈感;6. 推薦論文;7. 改進程式碼。
Localized display only
Students may use generative AI tools as learning aids for self-directed learning, text polishing, writing/language support, critical thinking, idea generation, paper recommendation, and code improvement.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: student_genai_citation_and_verification
Original evidence
Evidence 1正確引用:學生使用生成式 AI 工具輔助學習時,應在教師允許的情況下,符合明確註明應用動機、範圍及其引用之著作、資料出處等行為。資訊判斷與查證:學生應以批判思考檢視 AI 生成內容。
Localized display only
When permitted by instructors, students should state the purpose, scope, cited works, and data sources for AI-assisted learning, and should critically check AI-generated content.
Research
Normalized value: research_ai_disclosure_no_ai_author_human_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1研究過程中若使用AI工具,應在論文中誠實揭露使用方式。作者不應將 AI 和 AI 輔助技術列為作者或共同作者,因為它們無法對作品的準確性、完整性和原創性負責。使用 AI 輔助技術,作者應仔細審查和編輯結果,最後提交的結果由人類主責。
Localized display only
The KMU Library AI ethics page advises disclosure of AI use in research papers, says AI should not be listed as an author or co-author, and says humans are responsible for final submissions.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
academic.kmu.edu.tw
olis.kmu.edu.tw
academic.kmu.edu.tw