Bolzano, Italy

Free University of Bozen-Bolzano

Free University of Bozen-Bolzano has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.

Free University of Bozen-Bolzano AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Free University of Bozen-Bolzano has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Free University of Bozen-Bolzano is listed as QS 2026 rank =643.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Free University of Bozen-Bolzano as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/free-university-of-bozen-bolzano.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage5 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/free-university-of-bozen-bolzano.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence75%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

Free University of Bozen-Bolzano has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence72%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

The MSc Accounting and Finance master thesis guidelines allow AI tools in writing a master's thesis but require disclosure of advanced AI tools used, while stating that basic proofreading, grammar-checking, and translation tools do not need to be reported.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: allowed_with_advanced_ai_disclosure_for_msc_accounting_finance_thesis

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of AI tools in writing the Master’s thesis is allowed but must be transparently disclosed. Specifically, students who utilize AI tools must include a table titled “Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools in Preparing the Thesis” immediately after the list of references.

Ai Tool Treatment

The Faculty of Economics and Management bachelor thesis guidelines allow AI tools in writing a bachelor's thesis, but require students who use them to disclose the tools, purposes, and thesis sections in a table after the references.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: allowed_with_disclosure_for_faculty_bachelor_thesis

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of AI tools in writing the Bachelor’s thesis is allowed but must be transparently disclosed. Specifically, students who utilize AI tools must include a table titled “Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools in Preparing the Thesis” immediately after the list of references.

Academic Integrity

The MSc Accounting and Finance master thesis guidelines warn that AI outputs may be inaccurate or hallucinated, say students remain responsible for evaluating AI outputs and appropriate use, and state that Turnitin plagiarism checking is mandatory before final manuscript submission.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: student_responsibility_and_turnitin_for_msc_accounting_finance_thesis

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Moreover, generative AI applications may generate entirely inaccurate statements or results (“hallucinate”). Therefore, pay particular attention to the risk of including text that comes from other sources... The plagiarism check via Turnitin® is a mandatory part of your final examination.

Academic Integrity

The Faculty of Economics and Management bachelor thesis guidelines state that students remain responsible for evaluating AI outputs and warn that AI-generated text may create plagiarism risks; they also say Turnitin plagiarism checking is mandatory before final manuscript submission.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: student_responsibility_and_turnitin_for_faculty_bachelor_thesis

Original evidence

Evidence 1
While the use of AI-based aids is permitted, it is important to recognize that they serve only as a tool: students remain fully responsible for evaluating their outputs... Finally, the plagiarism check via Turnitin® is a mandatory part of your final examination.

Academic Integrity

The Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Library academic integrity page defines plagiarism as failing to give proper credit or using text incorrectly, and says the Library offers Turnitin to check originality against online sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%

Normalized value: plagiarism_definition_and_turnitin_originality_check

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You commit plagiarism if you do not give proper credit to the text, concept, research results etc. of another author or if you use a text incorrectly... With Turnitin® The Library offers a useful tool for checking the originality of one’s own texts.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities