Policy presence
Edinburgh Napier University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Edinburgh Napier University
Edinburgh Napier University has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 7 reviewed claims. Last checked May 21, 2026.
Edinburgh Napier University AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Edinburgh Napier University has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 7 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 21, 2026. Discovery context: Edinburgh Napier University is listed as QS 2026 rank 851-900.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Edinburgh Napier University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 21, 2026 and last changed on May 21, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/edinburgh-napier-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Edinburgh Napier University has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Edinburgh Napier University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Edinburgh Napier University has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Edinburgh Napier University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Edinburgh Napier University has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Edinburgh Napier University has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
Edinburgh Napier University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
Teaching guidance
Edinburgh Napier University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy states that inappropriate use of Generative AI in assessment, including presenting generated content as a student's own work, is cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: inappropriate_gen_ai_assessment_use_is_cheating
Original evidence
Evidence 1students' inappropriate use of Generative AI, such as the direct use of generated content presented in an assessment submission as their own work, constitutes a form of cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.
Academic Integrity
Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position states that the university does not permit Gen AI detection tools on student assessment submissions, and academic staff are not permitted to use external detection tools on student work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: gen_ai_detection_tools_not_permitted_for_student_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University Leadership does not permit the use of Gen AI detection tools on student assessment submissions, as current technologies have proven to be unreliable, prone to bias, and we do not have students' informed consent for their use with their work.
Academic Integrity
Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says every assessment will use the Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet for students to declare that the submission is their own work and acknowledge other-source contributions, including Generative AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessment_declaration_includes_gen_ai_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1The Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet will be used in every assessment for students to declare that their submission is their own work and that any contributions from other sources have been acknowledged, including any use of Generative AI.
Ai Tool Treatment
Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says undergraduate and taught postgraduate students who use Gen AI tools in learning or assessments must follow university guidance and acknowledge AI-generated content.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_using_gen_ai_must_follow_guidance_and_acknowledge_ai_content
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you use Gen AI tools in your learning or assessments, you must follow university guidance and acknowledge AI-generated content.
Privacy
Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says academic staff should never require students to sign up for or use Gen AI tools, citing privacy, ethical, and environmental concerns, and should provide an alternative means of engaging with the task.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: staff_should_not_require_student_gen_ai_tool_signup
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should never require students to sign-up for or use Gen AI tools, as they may have privacy, ethical and environmental concerns. Always provide an alternative means for engaging with the task
Teaching
Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says programme and module leaders will discuss students' use of generative AI and use the AI Toolkit traffic-light system and assessment briefs to indicate what use is appropriate.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessment_briefs_indicate_appropriate_gen_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Programme and module leaders will engage in dialogue with their students on their use of generative AI, using the AI Toolkit and its traffic-light system to indicate what use of generative AI is appropriate in their modules and assessments. Staff will use the assessment brief to indicate what use of Generative AI is appropriate in any given assessment.
Ai Tool Treatment
My Napier's student guidance tells students to check with their module leader or tutor about what, if any, Gen AI use is allowed in their work and to comply with module-leader guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_should_check_module_leader_for_allowed_gen_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should always first check with your module leader or tutor about what - if any - use of Gen AI is allowed in your work.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Edinburgh Napier University Assessment Policy
documentcentre.napier.ac.uk
Edinburgh Napier University's Position on Generative Artificial Intelligence: Our Shared Commitment to Ethical and Responsible Use
documentcentre.napier.ac.uk
Generative Artificial Intelligence tools and your learning
my.napier.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.