Fort Collins, United States

Colorado State University

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

10 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

CSU-GPT is listed for Colorado State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"CSU-GPT","description":"CSU-GPT is a CSU enterprise tool available to every student, faculty member, and staff member in CSU's secure Microsoft Azure environment.","howToObtain":"Use CSU-GPT through CSU's enterprise AI tools.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
CSU-GPT gives every student, faculty, and staff member a safe way to explore generative AI—inside CSU’s secure Microsoft Azure environment. These are enterprise tools provided through CSU’s Microsoft 365 agreement. They meet university security and compliance standards.

Localized display only

CSU-GPT gives every student, faculty, and staff member a safe way to explore generative AI—inside CSU’s secure Microsoft Azure environment. These are enterprise tools provided through CSU’s Microsoft 365 agreement. They meet university security and compliance standards.

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Colorado State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Chat","description":"Microsoft Copilot Chat is a CSU enterprise tool approved for sensitive CSU data when logged in with a CSU NetID.","howToObtain":"Sign in to Microsoft Copilot Chat with a CSU NetID.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Microsoft Copilot Chat (when logged in with your CSU NetID) is approved for handling sensitive CSU data. These are enterprise tools provided through CSU’s Microsoft 365 agreement. They meet university security and compliance standards.

Localized display only

Microsoft Copilot Chat (when logged in with your CSU NetID) is approved for handling sensitive CSU data. These are enterprise tools provided through CSU’s Microsoft 365 agreement. They meet university security and compliance standards.

Privacy

CSU's AI Tools page says other AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Anthropic Claude may be used for non-sensitive public information only.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: commercial_ai_public_information_only

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You may use other tools for non-sensitive, public information only. Many commercial AI tools have privacy statements that allow them to collect and store your data, and in many cases, they may use your input to train future models.

Privacy

CSU-GPT is described by CSU as operating inside CSU's Microsoft Azure environment, keeping data, prompts, and uploads inside the university's Microsoft Azure tenant.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: csu_gpt_azure_tenant_data_handling

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Unlike public AI tools, CSU-GPT keeps all data, prompts, and uploads inside the university's Microsoft Azure tenant. That means your data never leaves CSU.

Ai Tool Treatment

CSU's AI Tools page lists CSU-GPT, Microsoft Copilot Chat with CSU NetID, and Microsoft Teams Premium as currently approved tools for handling sensitive CSU data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: approved_sensitive_ai_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Only three tools are currently approved for handling sensitive CSU data (such as research data, student information, or protected university records): CSU-GPT; Microsoft Copilot Chat (When logged in with your CSU NetID); Microsoft Teams Premium.

Source Status

The CSU System AI Governance Guidelines state that they apply to individuals handling institutional data or using AI tools in administrative operations, research, clinical, and educational activities across the CSU system.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: system_ai_governance_guidelines_scope

Original evidence

Evidence 1
These guidelines apply to all individuals handling institutional data or using AI tools in administrative operations, research, clinical, and educational activities across the CSU system.

Academic Integrity

CSU's Student Resolution Center defines cheating to include unauthorized sources or assistance and instructor-prohibited behavior, and defines plagiarism as representing another's language, structure, images, ideas, or thoughts as one's own without proper acknowledgment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: academic_misconduct_cheating_plagiarism_definitions

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Cheating includes using unauthorized sources of information and providing or receiving unauthorized assistance on any form of academic work or engaging in any behavior specifically prohibited by the instructor in the course syllabus or class presentation. Plagiarism includes the copying of language, structure, images, ideas, or thoughts of another, and representing them as one's own without proper acknowledgment.

Security Review

For CSU System internal, confidential, and restricted data classifications, the AI Governance Guidelines say users should verify data classification, follow applicable policies, and use CSU-approved tools; restricted data also requires additional approval for AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: classified_data_ai_use_requires_approved_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Level 2 (Internal): Verify data classification before use, adhere to approved CSU data and AI policies, use only CSU-approved tools... Level 4 (Restricted): Verify data classification before use... use only CSU-approved tools with the highest level of contractual data protection guarantees; requires additional approval for any AI use.

Teaching

CSU TILT guidance says AI syllabus statements should remain consistent with university and department policy on assessing student work and provide students clarity about instructor expectations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence83%

Normalized value: ai_syllabus_statement_clarity_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
However, it is important that they remain consistent with university and department policy on assessing student work. Finally, the most important part of including a statement is that it provides clarity to your students about your expectations.

Academic Integrity

An official CSU MTI teaching page states that work submitted for credit that was created by AI engines can be addressed under multiple areas of the Academic Misconduct section of the Student Conduct Code.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: mti_ai_created_work_conduct_code_guidance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Is work (essays, responses, code, images) created by an artificial intelligence engine still covered by our Student Conduct Code's language? Yes. Definitively. The Student Conduct Code was written to address behavior, not technologies. In addition, work submitted for credit that was created by AI-engines can be addressed using multiple areas of the Academic Misconduct section of the Student Conduct Code.

Source record

Official sources

7 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Colorado State University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/colorado-state-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log