Providence, United States Last checked

Brown University

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Search universities

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Conditions and evidence gaps

Faculty set clear AI expectations for their courses; unapproved AI completion of assignments falls under the Academic Code.

Official source ↗

Exams

Conditions and evidence gaps

Follow the course’s explicit AI expectations; the recorded guidance does not supply a campus-wide examination permission.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Conditions and evidence gaps

No specific AI disclosure format is established in the current reviewed Claims. Check the course or publication instructions.

Official source ↗

Privacy and data

Conditions and evidence gaps

Level 2/3 Brown data cannot enter public AI without a protective Brown contract. Institutional Gemini/NotebookLM are described as usable with Risk Level 3 data.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Conditions and evidence gaps

Gemini Chat and NotebookLM are optional no-cost tools for specified Brown students, staff and faculty; consumer services have different terms.

Official source ↗

Research and publication

Conditions and evidence gaps

OIT research guidance calls for deep review of AI-generated code for quality and efficiency; it does not itself set publication authorship rules.

Official source ↗
More reviewed record topics

Academic integrity

Conditions and evidence gaps

Unapproved AI used to complete assignments is covered by undergraduate and graduate Academic Codes.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Conditions and evidence gaps

Faculty should give clear, unambiguous directions on whether and how students may use GenAI.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Conditions and evidence gaps

AI use remains subject to acceptable-use, copyright, conduct and contract-review policies.

Official source ↗

Additional source context

Context only

These supplementary source quotations provide context. Use the current published Claims for the rule and its applicable scope.

Frozen record evidence

Historical input context

These earlier records provide context; no current investigation, sanction or appeal deadline is established by the published Claims.

Procedure source context

Scope and version conditions retained

These earlier records provide context; no current investigation, sanction or appeal deadline is established by the published Claims.

Before you submit

Do

  • Check the faculty member’s explicit course expectations.
    Site advice
  • Use the institutional Gemini/NotebookLM service when relying on its stated data protection.
    Site advice
  • Review generated research code for quality and efficiency.
    Source guidance

Don’t

  • Do not use AI to complete assignments without authorization for that use.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not place Level 2/3 data in publicly available or vendor-enabled AI tools without a specific-service protective Brown contract.
    Requirement in this scope
  • Do not assume consumer tools have the institutional service’s data permission.
    Site advice

AI use questioned?

Brown University

Course expectations are set by faculty under the recorded Provost guidance. OIT data permissions and communications/research guidance have separate scopes.

Investigation & response

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Possible outcomes

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

Review & appeal

The current evidence does not include a verified specific procedure or deadline. Check the applicable university rules.

AI tools & access

No source-backed tool record has been established for this university yet. This does not mean AI tools are unavailable or prohibited.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 3

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

  1. Page update

    Other records · Page update

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  2. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

  3. Record maintenance

    Other records · Record maintenance

    View revision

    Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

11

Official sources

6 official URLs; 7 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

AI Guidelines for Brown Communicators

ouc.brown.edu

University official source

ouc.brown.edu

Hash and captured version

AI Guidelines for Brown Communicators · 2026-05-12T18:00:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

d68530313ee8997cf940d0f4b8544083aac68e530f4abac97886e3410bc895a9

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Generative AI as a Research Tool

ithelp.brown.edu

University official source

ithelp.brown.edu

Hash and captured version

Generative AI as a Research Tool · 2026-05-12T18:00:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

6baa7056b92373108e9f841d56fb8ff3fc3d70c9717cbb51ff44b4ef50ab2064

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Google Gemini Chat and NotebookLM AI Services

ithelp.brown.edu

University official source

ithelp.brown.edu

Hash and captured version

Google Gemini Chat and NotebookLM AI Services · 2026-05-12T18:00:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

5f6de8840f33aaad438252ad21684ce67247b3d473b5f521c3636afbd355206d

Google Gemini Chat and NotebookLM AI Services · 2026-07-15T22:36:43.896Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

cb79f46782ed1c5422febec463707c17d373e9c0e56fb57889d22f47c1a62d87

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Intentional Pedagogy with AI Technology

sheridan.brown.edu

University official source

sheridan.brown.edu

Hash and captured version

Intentional Pedagogy with AI Technology · 2026-05-12T18:00:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

40098b79579eeca4c86d2da6aa1b344ba8640d2833ed1906a23070ecbc6f4c28

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Potential impact of AI on our academic mission

provost.brown.edu

University official source

provost.brown.edu

Hash and captured version

Potential impact of AI on our academic mission · 2026-05-12T18:00:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

31855bf7255585cb22686b19b076c2a8d9dc848b1f6c81667a60254ddf2b9b9a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Protecting Information When Using AI Tools

ithelp.brown.edu

University official source

ithelp.brown.edu

Hash and captured version

Protecting Information When Using AI Tools · 2026-05-12T18:00:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

2dc5cb9c76574f1c04449713c1490df8ea9acf287492ba4908499dd2f26df060

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗
Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state
agent_reviewed
Analysis review state
machine_candidate
Record revision
public-release-20260924-002
Dataset release
public-release-20260924-002
Correction published
Student snapshot
Not published
Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

  • Institution-wide evidence audit remains PARTIAL. Supplementary quotations are not independently verified by this presentation release.
  • Current JSON and MCP retain the previous public Claim set. Local candidate corrections and held decisions remain private and pending review.
  • Source excerpts retain their declared capture limitations. Original official HTTP/PDF bytes were not verified by this release.
  • Institutional semantic audit remains PARTIAL. Student-facing display is derived from existing published Claims; no new institutional tool record, source verification or strong snapshot approval.
        Current reviewed JSON
        Questions students ask

        Questions students ask

        Can I use AI for my coursework?

        Faculty set clear AI expectations for their courses; unapproved AI completion of assignments falls under the Academic Code.

        View evidence →
        Do I need to disclose AI use?

        No specific AI disclosure format is established in the current reviewed Claims. Check the course or publication instructions.

        View evidence →
        Can I upload sensitive data?

        Level 2/3 Brown data cannot enter public AI without a protective Brown contract. Institutional Gemini/NotebookLM are described as usable with Risk Level 3 data.

        View evidence →
        Which tools can I access?

        Gemini Chat and NotebookLM are optional no-cost tools for specified Brown students, staff and faculty; consumer services have different terms.

        View evidence →
        What are the examination rules?

        Follow the course’s explicit AI expectations; the recorded guidance does not supply a campus-wide examination permission.

        View evidence →
        What rules apply to research and publication?

        OIT research guidance calls for deep review of AI-generated code for quality and efficiency; it does not itself set publication authorship rules.

        View evidence →
        What counts as academic misconduct?

        Unapproved AI used to complete assignments is covered by undergraduate and graduate Academic Codes.

        View evidence →
        What guidance applies to teaching?

        Faculty should give clear, unambiguous directions on whether and how students may use GenAI.

        View evidence →
        What security and procurement requirements apply?

        AI use remains subject to acceptable-use, copyright, conduct and contract-review policies.

        View evidence →
        When was this record checked?

        Record checked:

        Record version →
        Which official sources support these rules?Official source →
        Where can I read the full evidence?

        11 · Full policy evidence

        Full policy evidence →