London, United Kingdom

Birkbeck, University of London

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

4 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: ai_declaration_required_for_moodle_assessments

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including those where no AI use is permitted by the Assessment Brief.

Ai Tool Treatment

Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: assessment_brief_scoped_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You should only use AI tools, including generative AI, to the extent that has been outlined in the assessment brief. Some assessments will permit the use of AI tools for some aspects of your work, while others will not permit any use of AI tools at all.

Academic Integrity

Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: students_should_retain_ai_prompts_outputs

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You should retain evidence of your use of AI tools including generative AI. This could be in the form of transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs.

Academic Integrity

Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_generated_content_can_be_contract_cheating

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This might include using generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to create content and/or argument for your assessment which you then present as your own intellectual work. If you are permitted to use generative AI tools to create content, this will be included in the assessment brief with guidance.

Source record

Official sources

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence95%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Birkbeck, University of London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/birkbeck-university-of-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log