Policy presence
Australian Catholic University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Melbourne, Australia
Australian Catholic University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Australian Catholic University has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Australian Catholic University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Australian Catholic University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Australian Catholic University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Australian Catholic University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Australian Catholic University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Australian Catholic University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
Australian Catholic University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Australian Catholic University has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: assessment_ai_authorized_and_acknowledged
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unauthorised or undisclosed use of artificial intelligence: using generative (content production) artificial intelligence, paraphrasing and translation tools unless their use is authorised in the assessment requirements and is properly acknowledged.
Source Status
Normalized value: formal_ai_principles_policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1This Policy aims to ensure that adoption of Artificial Intelligence in ACU's education, research, research training and operations is undertaken ethically, responsibly, fairly and lawfully. This Policy applies to all University Members, staff and students.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: human_oversight_and_privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Artificial Intelligence must only be used as a tool to supplement human decision-making rather than replace it. Humans retain active responsibility for decisions made with Artificial Intelligence support. The respect for privacy is to be upheld in all Artificial Intelligence related activities at ACU.
Research
Normalized value: hdr_genai_declare_acknowledge_no_sensitive_information
Original evidence
Evidence 1HDR candidates should, for thesis preparation, only use GenAI specifically for copyediting and proofreading and this use should be declared; discuss intended GenAI use with supervisors; record and acknowledge tool usage and all prompts; and not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.
Teaching
Normalized value: student_guidance_contextual_authorization_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but its use must be explicitly allowed - particularly in assessment tasks. Always refer to your unit outline or tutor's instructions. If GenAI use is not clearly authorised, it should not be used.
0 machine or needs-review claim
5 source attribution
staff.acu.edu.au
libguides.acu.edu.au
staff.acu.edu.au
policy.acu.edu.au
policy.acu.edu.au