University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

Australian Catholic University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 21, 2026Last changedMay 21, 2026Claims5Sources5
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Australian Catholic University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 21, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Australian Catholic University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Australian Catholic University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.
3+Evidence (en, 62891cd6f346): Unauthorised or undisclosed use of artificial intelligence: using generative (content production) artificial intelligence, paraphrasing and translation tools unless their use is authorised in the assessment requirements and is properly acknowledged.
4+source_status: Australian Catholic University has an official AI principles policy for teaching, research and research training that applies to University Members, staff and students.
5+Evidence (en, 49b32f90c996): This Policy aims to ensure that adoption of Artificial Intelligence in ACU's education, research, research training and operations is undertaken ethically, responsibly, fairly and lawfully. This Policy applies to all University Members, staff and students.
6+ai_tool_treatment: ACU's AI principles say AI must supplement rather than replace human decision-making, with humans retaining responsibility, and require privacy risks to be assessed and mitigated for AI-related activities.
7+Evidence (en, 49b32f90c996): Artificial Intelligence must only be used as a tool to supplement human decision-making rather than replace it. Humans retain active responsibility for decisions made with Artificial Intelligence support. The respect for privacy is to be upheld in all Artificial Intelligence related activities at ACU.
8+research: ACU research guidance says HDR candidates should declare GenAI use for thesis copyediting/proofreading, discuss intended research use with supervisors, record and acknowledge tool usage and prompts, and should not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.
9+Evidence (en, 319a49591d00): HDR candidates should, for thesis preparation, only use GenAI specifically for copyediting and proofreading and this use should be declared; discuss intended GenAI use with supervisors; record and acknowledge tool usage and all prompts; and not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.
10+teaching: ACU Library guidance tells students that GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but assessment use should be clearly authorized and acknowledged, and final work should reflect the student's own analysis and understanding.
11+Evidence (en, 15b576a53675): GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but its use must be explicitly allowed - particularly in assessment tasks. Always refer to your unit outline or tutor's instructions. If GenAI use is not clearly authorised, it should not be used.

Claim changes

5 claim records

research

ACU research guidance says HDR candidates should declare GenAI use for thesis copyediting/proofreading, discuss intended research use with supervisors, record and acknowledge tool usage and prompts, and should not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

ACU Library guidance tells students that GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but assessment use should be clearly authorized and acknowledged, and final work should reflect the student's own analysis and understanding.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

ACU's AI principles say AI must supplement rather than replace human decision-making, with humans retaining responsibility, and require privacy risks to be assessed and mitigated for AI-related activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Australian Catholic University has an official AI principles policy for teaching, research and research training that applies to University Members, staff and students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions

Principles for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Research and Research Training Policy

official_policy_page checked May 21, 2026

Snapshot hash
49b32f90c996a197e1ccb950fab3614d40c2e335b3fb2ca36354d2eca34cca15