Ревизия записи

The University of Tokyo

Обновления проверенной записи на этом сайте, а не подтверждение того, что университет изменил свою политику.

Время публикации трекера не является датой вступления в силу университетской политики.

Редакция: qs35-40-v6-r3-20261022 ·

Предыдущая зафиксированная редакция: baseline-qs35-40-20261022

Что означает это обновление записи

Обзор структурированных записей

Затронуто записей: 39 (30 исправлено / скорректировано · 9 добавлено.)

Обращение с инструментами ИИ · Преподавание · Ещё тем: 7

Для этой редакции пока нет независимо проверенной сводки.

Это краткая историческая справка, а не подтверждение текущего разрешения или новое университетское правило.

Академическая добросовестность · Затронуто записей: 4 (3 исправлено / скорректировано · 1 добавлено.)

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo states that submitting AI-generated answers by copy-pasting them entirely provides no learning effect and should basically not be permitted.

Новый текст

UTokyo states that submitting AI-generated answers by copy-pasting them entirely provides no learning effect and should basically not be permitted.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

Новый текст

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo policy states that even when AI use is allowed, simply copying and pasting AI-generated answers should not be accepted as it provides no learning effect.

Новый текст

UTokyo policy states that even when AI use is allowed, simply copying and pasting AI-generated answers should not be accepted as it provides no learning effect.

Преподавание · Затронуто записей: 10 (6 исправлено / скорректировано · 4 добавлено.)

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo leaves decisions on AI tool use in individual classes to faculty, who should decide based on maximizing educational effectiveness rather than following a blanket university rule.

Новый текст

UTokyo leaves decisions on AI tool use in individual classes to faculty, who should decide based on maximizing educational effectiveness rather than following a blanket university rule.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo warns faculty not to over-rely on AI detection tools, as they are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use given the rapid evolution of generative tools.

Новый текст

UTokyo warns faculty not to over-rely on AI detection tools, as they are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use given the rapid evolution of generative tools.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo leaves the decision on whether to allow AI tools and the conditions for their use to the discretion of individual instructors, varying by class.

Новый текст

UTokyo leaves the decision on whether to allow AI tools and the conditions for their use to the discretion of individual instructors, varying by class.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.

Новый текст

UTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

UTokyo requires instructors to clearly state their AI stance per class/assignment, and when allowing AI use, to explain risks: information leakage, data concentration, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

Новый текст

UTokyo requires course instructors to clearly designate permitted AI use, which effective September 29, 2026 must be configured in UTOL using standardized labels (T0–T5 or Other).

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo warns faculty that AI detection tools should not be over-relied upon, as their judgments are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use.

Новый текст

UTokyo warns faculty that AI detection tools should not be over-relied upon, as their judgments are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use.

Конфиденциальность · Затронуто записей: 4 (3 исправлено / скорректировано · 1 добавлено.)

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo requires instructors who allow AI use to explain associated risks to students: information leakage, data concentration in few companies, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

Новый текст

UTokyo requires instructors who allow AI use to explain associated risks to students: information leakage, data concentration in few companies, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.

Новый текст

UTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo warns students to never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools, as the information might be leaked or used for AI training.

Новый текст

UTokyo warns students to never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools, as the information might be leaked or used for AI training.

Добавление записи

Добавлено

Under official faculty guidance and student notices, students and faculty are cautioned against information leakage: students must never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools due to potential leakage or model training use, and faculty are instructed that examination questions, being highly confidential documents, must basically (基本的に) not be input into language-generating AI in unchanged form. The separate 'Security Guidelines for Generative AI Use' (March 12, 2024) require internal UTokyo Account authentication and are held as an unverified private source.

Проверка безопасности · Затронуто записей: 1 (1 исправлено / скорректировано)

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

UTokyo has established security guidelines for generative AI use (March 2024), referenced in the AI service policy.

Новый текст

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): The public March27,2024 notice links to Security Guidelines for Generative AI Use dated March12,2024. Only the reference/title was captured; its authenticated full text and detailed requirements remain unverified.

Исследования · Затронуто записей: 1 (1 добавлено.)

Добавление записи

Добавлено

Under Rule No. 79 (東京大学科学研究行動規範委員会規則), formal scientific research misconduct investigations establish procedural timelines qualified in principle (原則として): the preliminary inquiry results must be reported to the Committee Chair in principle within 30 days of receiving an allegation (Art. 8(5)); the Investigation Committee commences formal investigation in principle within 30 days of the decision to investigate (Art. 9(2)); the Committee makes its adjudication determination in principle within 150 days of starting formal investigation (Art. 11(1)); respondent defense opportunity is granted in principle within 14 days of receiving draft determination notification (Art. 11(7)); and a respondent against whom misconduct was determined may file an objection/appeal to the Committee Chair in principle within 30 days of receiving the determination notice under Art. 11(11) (Art. 12(1)). These clocks apply exclusively to scientific research misconduct proceedings and do not govern undergraduate or generic coursework discipline.

Обращение с инструментами ИИ · Затронуто записей: 15 (13 исправлено / скорректировано · 2 добавлено.)

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

Cisco AI アシスタント is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Cisco AI アシスタント is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

Gemini is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Google Gemini is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with ECCS Cloud Email accounts under institutional data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with UTokyo Accounts with commercial data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

Copilot in Teams is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Copilot in Teams is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

Slack AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Slack AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

Slido AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Slido AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

Webex AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Webex AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Новый текст

Zoom AI Companion is provided to eligible members of The University of Tokyo under institutional Zoom licenses; institutional access does not grant assessment permission.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education; instead, it actively explores their potential while continuing dialogue on practical knowledge and long-term impact.

Новый текст

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education; instead, it actively explores their potential while continuing dialogue on practical knowledge and long-term impact.

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

UTokyo does not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential in education and research while providing practical usage guidance.

Новый текст

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): UTokyo does not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential in education and research while providing practical usage guidance.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo does not enforce a blanket prohibition on generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential and provides practical guidance.

Новый текст

UTokyo does not enforce a blanket prohibition on generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential and provides practical guidance.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in educational settings, per official policy signed by the Executive Vice President.

Новый текст

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in educational settings, per official policy signed by the Executive Vice President.

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

UTokyo provides Gemini and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as university-wide contracted AI chat services; there is no university-wide ChatGPT contract.

Новый текст

The captured utelecon catalogue names Gemini and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as the two main university-contracted chat AI services. This listing does not establish that no other institutional contract exists.

Закупки · Затронуто записей: 2 (2 исправлено / скорректировано)

Исправление сайта

Изменения в тексте вывода по сайту
Старый текст

UTokyo centers its university-wide generative AI service on Microsoft Copilot, leveraging existing Microsoft contracts for low operational and cost burden.

Новый текст

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): UTokyo centers its university-wide generative AI service on Microsoft Copilot, leveraging existing Microsoft contracts for low operational and cost burden.

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo provides AI features embedded in multiple platforms (Zoom AI Companion, Slack AI, Cisco AI Assistant, Slido AI, Copilot in Teams) through university-wide contracts.

Новый текст

UTokyo provides AI features embedded in multiple platforms (Zoom AI Companion, Slack AI, Cisco AI Assistant, Slido AI, Copilot in Teams) through university-wide contracts.

Статус источника · Затронуто записей: 1 (1 исправлено / скорректировано)

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo's utelecon portal maintains a Policies and Guidelines index page linking to BYOD policy, generative AI information, and AI tools notifications.

Новый текст

UTokyo's utelecon portal maintains a Policies and Guidelines index page linking to BYOD policy, generative AI information, and AI tools notifications.

Другие записи · Затронуто записей: 1 (1 исправлено / скорректировано)

Исправление сайта

Сопоставимый старый и новый текст недоступен.

Старый текст

UTokyo warns that using AI-generated results as-is may entail future legal risks related to copyright and design rights.

Новый текст

UTokyo warns that using AI-generated results as-is may entail future legal risks related to copyright and design rights.

Официальные источники · Проверка источника