Įrašo redakcija

The University of Tokyo

Atnaujinimai šios svetainės peržiūrėtame įraše, o ne patvirtinimas, kad universitetas pakeitė savo politiką.

Sekimo įrankio publikavimo laikas nėra universiteto politikos įsigaliojimo data.

Peržiūra: qs35-40-v6-r3-20261022 ·

Ankstesnė užfiksuota redakcija: baseline-qs35-40-20261022

Ką reiškia šis įrašo atnaujinimas

Struktūrizuota įrašų apžvalga

Susiję įrašai: 39 (30 patikslinta / pakoreguota · 9 pridėta)

DI įrankio traktavimas · Dėstymas · Dar 7 temų

Šiai redakcijai nepriklausomai išnagrinėtos santraukos dar nėra.

Tai yra istorinio įrašo santrauka, o ne dabartinio leidimo ar naujos universiteto taisyklės patvirtinimas.

Akademinis sąžiningumas · Susiję įrašai: 4 (3 patikslinta / pakoreguota · 1 pridėta)

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo states that submitting AI-generated answers by copy-pasting them entirely provides no learning effect and should basically not be permitted.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo states that submitting AI-generated answers by copy-pasting them entirely provides no learning effect and should basically not be permitted.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo policy states that even when AI use is allowed, simply copying and pasting AI-generated answers should not be accepted as it provides no learning effect.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo policy states that even when AI use is allowed, simply copying and pasting AI-generated answers should not be accepted as it provides no learning effect.

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

When students submit reports that utilized generative AI tools, course instructors are officially recommended to have students clearly specify which generative AI tools were used; specific attribution format and disclosure requirements remain at faculty discretion.

Dėstymas · Susiję įrašai: 10 (6 patikslinta / pakoreguota · 4 pridėta)

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo leaves decisions on AI tool use in individual classes to faculty, who should decide based on maximizing educational effectiveness rather than following a blanket university rule.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo leaves decisions on AI tool use in individual classes to faculty, who should decide based on maximizing educational effectiveness rather than following a blanket university rule.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo warns faculty not to over-rely on AI detection tools, as they are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use given the rapid evolution of generative tools.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo warns faculty not to over-rely on AI detection tools, as they are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use given the rapid evolution of generative tools.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo leaves the decision on whether to allow AI tools and the conditions for their use to the discretion of individual instructors, varying by class.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo leaves the decision on whether to allow AI tools and the conditions for their use to the discretion of individual instructors, varying by class.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

UTokyo requires instructors to clearly state their AI stance per class/assignment, and when allowing AI use, to explain risks: information leakage, data concentration, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo requires course instructors to clearly designate permitted AI use, which effective September 29, 2026 must be configured in UTOL using standardized labels (T0–T5 or Other).

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo warns faculty that AI detection tools should not be over-relied upon, as their judgments are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo warns faculty that AI detection tools should not be over-relied upon, as their judgments are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use.

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

Effective September 29, 2026, setting 'Permitted AI Use' is mandatory for all assignment creation in UTOL (UTokyo Online Learning), requiring course instructors to designate a standardized permission level or provide explicit custom instructions.

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

UTOL assignments classify permitted generative AI use into six standardized ranges (T0 No AI Use; T1 questions/research only; T2 discussion/idea-bouncing; T3 feedback; T4 drafting; T5 creative use) or 'Other' with required written explanation.

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

The University of Tokyo educational AI framework classifies typical AI use scenarios into five sequential categories (S1 questions/research; S2 discussion/idea-bouncing; S3 feedback; S4 drafting; S5 creative use) mapping directly to UTOL assignment permission labels T0–T5.

Privatumas · Susiję įrašai: 4 (3 patikslinta / pakoreguota · 1 pridėta)

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo requires instructors who allow AI use to explain associated risks to students: information leakage, data concentration in few companies, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo requires instructors who allow AI use to explain associated risks to students: information leakage, data concentration in few companies, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo warns students to never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools, as the information might be leaked or used for AI training.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo warns students to never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools, as the information might be leaked or used for AI training.

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

Under official faculty guidance and student notices, students and faculty are cautioned against information leakage: students must never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools due to potential leakage or model training use, and faculty are instructed that examination questions, being highly confidential documents, must basically (基本的に) not be input into language-generating AI in unchanged form. The separate 'Security Guidelines for Generative AI Use' (March 12, 2024) require internal UTokyo Account authentication and are held as an unverified private source.

Saugumo peržiūra · Susiję įrašai: 1 (1 patikslinta / pakoreguota)

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

UTokyo has established security guidelines for generative AI use (March 2024), referenced in the AI service policy.

Naujas tekstas

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): The public March27,2024 notice links to Security Guidelines for Generative AI Use dated March12,2024. Only the reference/title was captured; its authenticated full text and detailed requirements remain unverified.

Moksliniai tyrimai · Susiję įrašai: 1 (1 pridėta)

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

Under Rule No. 79 (東京大学科学研究行動規範委員会規則), formal scientific research misconduct investigations establish procedural timelines qualified in principle (原則として): the preliminary inquiry results must be reported to the Committee Chair in principle within 30 days of receiving an allegation (Art. 8(5)); the Investigation Committee commences formal investigation in principle within 30 days of the decision to investigate (Art. 9(2)); the Committee makes its adjudication determination in principle within 150 days of starting formal investigation (Art. 11(1)); respondent defense opportunity is granted in principle within 14 days of receiving draft determination notification (Art. 11(7)); and a respondent against whom misconduct was determined may file an objection/appeal to the Committee Chair in principle within 30 days of receiving the determination notice under Art. 11(11) (Art. 12(1)). These clocks apply exclusively to scientific research misconduct proceedings and do not govern undergraduate or generic coursework discipline.

DI įrankio traktavimas · Susiję įrašai: 15 (13 patikslinta / pakoreguota · 2 pridėta)

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

Cisco AI アシスタント is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Cisco AI アシスタント is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

Gemini is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Google Gemini is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with ECCS Cloud Email accounts under institutional data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with UTokyo Accounts with commercial data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

Copilot in Teams is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Copilot in Teams is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

Slack AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Slack AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

Slido AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Slido AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

Webex AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Webex AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Naujas tekstas

Zoom AI Companion is provided to eligible members of The University of Tokyo under institutional Zoom licenses; institutional access does not grant assessment permission.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education; instead, it actively explores their potential while continuing dialogue on practical knowledge and long-term impact.

Naujas tekstas

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education; instead, it actively explores their potential while continuing dialogue on practical knowledge and long-term impact.

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

UTokyo does not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential in education and research while providing practical usage guidance.

Naujas tekstas

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): UTokyo does not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential in education and research while providing practical usage guidance.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo does not enforce a blanket prohibition on generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential and provides practical guidance.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo does not enforce a blanket prohibition on generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential and provides practical guidance.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in educational settings, per official policy signed by the Executive Vice President.

Naujas tekstas

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in educational settings, per official policy signed by the Executive Vice President.

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

UTokyo provides Gemini and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as university-wide contracted AI chat services; there is no university-wide ChatGPT contract.

Naujas tekstas

The captured utelecon catalogue names Gemini and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as the two main university-contracted chat AI services. This listing does not establish that no other institutional contract exists.

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

Effective February 24, 2026, Gemini generative AI features are integrated into Google Docs, Google Slides, and Google Forms for U-Tokyo users assigned Google Workspace for Education Plus licenses; tool presence does not authorize coursework drafting unless permitted by the instructor.

Įrašo pridėjimas

Pridėta

Zoom AI Companion features (meeting summaries, in-meeting queries, smart recording highlights) are provided under U-Tokyo's campus-wide Zoom license, with meeting hosts controlling activation; institutional access does not grant coursework or exam permission.

Pirkimas · Susiję įrašai: 2 (2 patikslinta / pakoreguota)

Svetainės pataisymas

Svetainės išvadų teksto pakeitimai
Senas tekstas

UTokyo centers its university-wide generative AI service on Microsoft Copilot, leveraging existing Microsoft contracts for low operational and cost burden.

Naujas tekstas

Historical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): UTokyo centers its university-wide generative AI service on Microsoft Copilot, leveraging existing Microsoft contracts for low operational and cost burden.

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo provides AI features embedded in multiple platforms (Zoom AI Companion, Slack AI, Cisco AI Assistant, Slido AI, Copilot in Teams) through university-wide contracts.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo provides AI features embedded in multiple platforms (Zoom AI Companion, Slack AI, Cisco AI Assistant, Slido AI, Copilot in Teams) through university-wide contracts.

Šaltinio būsena · Susiję įrašai: 1 (1 patikslinta / pakoreguota)

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo's utelecon portal maintains a Policies and Guidelines index page linking to BYOD policy, generative AI information, and AI tools notifications.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo's utelecon portal maintains a Policies and Guidelines index page linking to BYOD policy, generative AI information, and AI tools notifications.

Kiti įrašai · Susiję įrašai: 1 (1 patikslinta / pakoreguota)

Svetainės pataisymas

Palyginamas senas ir naujas tekstas nėra prieinamas.

Senas tekstas

UTokyo warns that using AI-generated results as-is may entail future legal risks related to copyright and design rights.

Naujas tekstas

UTokyo warns that using AI-generated results as-is may entail future legal risks related to copyright and design rights.

Oficialūs šaltiniai · Šaltinio patikra