Adicionado
The guidelines state that authors remain fully responsible for verifying the accuracy of AI-assisted work, rigorously fact-checking it and proactively confirming it is free from plagiarism.
Histórico do registo
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD)
Atualizações ao registo revisto deste site, não uma confirmação de que a universidade alterou a sua política.
Revisões correspondentes: 1
Registos envolvidos: 7 (7 adicionados)
Revisão: public-release-20260727-015Ver revisão
O que significa esta atualização do registo
Registos envolvidos: 7 (7 adicionados)
Tratamento de Ferramentas de IA · Integridade acadêmica · mais 2 temas
Integridade acadêmica · Registos envolvidos: 2 (2 adicionados)
Adicionado
Course-level plagiarism policies are expected to set differentiated consequences for AI misuse while rewarding honest, responsible engagement with AI tools.
Ensino · Registos envolvidos: 2 (2 adicionados)
Adicionado
IIT Delhi's committee holds that outright restriction of GenAI tools is neither enforceable nor desirable and recommends that each course instructor develop their own plagiarism policy governing AI use.
Adicionado
Academic Units are advised to reevaluate assessment methods, prioritizing approaches that AI tools cannot easily replicate.
Privacidade · Registos envolvidos: 1 (1 adicionados)
Adicionado
The guidelines direct all users to exercise caution when entering data into GenAI tools and to screen out sensitive or private details before use.
Histórico de revisões abertoTratamento de Ferramentas de IA · Registos envolvidos: 2 (2 adicionados)
Adicionado
IIT Delhi's GenAI guidelines call for full disclosure of any work or content generated with the assistance of GenAI tools, including noting AI-created images, tables, data visualizations, or significant text sections.
Adicionado
The committee recommends that IIT Delhi acquire institute-wide licenses for paid GenAI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to ensure equitable access.