teaching
TU Darmstadt provides a generative AI handreichung as orientation for students and lecturers, covering reflected, transparent use, good scientific practice, and context-specific rules for examinations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Technical University of Darmstadt
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Technical University of Darmstadt currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Technical University of Darmstadt. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Technical University of Darmstadt combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+8-0
11 # Technical University of Darmstadt AI policy record
2+teaching: TU Darmstadt provides a generative AI handreichung as orientation for students and lecturers, covering reflected, transparent use, good scientific practice, and context-specific rules for examinations.
3+Evidence (de, cad835304582): Die TU Darmstadt stellt mit der Handreichung zu generativer KI eine Orientierungshilfe für Studierende und Lehrende bereit. Sie unterstützt dabei, KI-Hilfsmittel reflektiert, transparent und im Sinne guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis einzusetzen.
4+academic_integrity: TU Darmstadt's HDA guidance says students remain responsible for submitted work, while lecturers decide whether and how AI may be used in an examination task.
5+Evidence (de, cad835304582): Wichtig ist: Die Verantwortung für eingereichte Arbeiten bleibt immer bei den Studierenden. Ob und wie KI in einer Prüfungsleistung genutzt werden darf, legen die jeweiligen Lehrenden fest.
6+privacy: TU Darmstadt's data protection page says personal data may be used in AI-related teaching only under data protection rules and identifies prompt submitters as responsible for AI-generated data protection violations.
7+Evidence (de, 20ed682206aa): Personenbezogene Daten dürfen nur mach den Regeln des Datenschutzes eingesetzt werden. Daten sind dann personenbezogen, wenn sie die Identifikation einer Person ermöglichen, Art. 4 Nr. 1 DSGVO. Verantwortlich für Datenschutzverletzungen in der Hochschullehre sind diejenigen, die durch Eingabe von Prompts das Erzeugen der KI-Ergebnisse anstoßen und formen.
8+academic_integrity: TU Darmstadt's Computer Science department treats AI tools as examination aids under APB section 22(7), says they must be listed in written work when used, and warns that undisclosed or prohibited use can trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.
9+Evidence (de, 671ab03bd950): KI-Hilfsmittel sind im Sinne des §22 (7) APB als Hilfsmittel zu verstehen und müssen deshalb immer als solche in den Quellenangaben einer schriftlichen Arbeit angegeben werden. Sollten KI-Hilfsmittel trotz Verwendung nicht als Hilfsmittel angegeben oder trotz Untersagung als Hilfsmittel eingesetzt worden sein, droht die Feststellung eines Täuschungsversuchs nach §38 APB.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
4 claim records
academic_integrity
TU Darmstadt's HDA guidance says students remain responsible for submitted work, while lecturers decide whether and how AI may be used in an examination task.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
TU Darmstadt's data protection page says personal data may be used in AI-related teaching only under data protection rules and identifies prompt submitters as responsible for AI-generated data protection violations.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
TU Darmstadt's Computer Science department treats AI tools as examination aids under APB section 22(7), says they must be listed in written work when used, and warns that undisclosed or prohibited use can trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
Datenschutzbeauftragter
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:24 AM
Handreichung generative KI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:22 AM
KI-Hilfsmittel in Pruefungen
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:25 AM