Change log

Duke University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 12, 2026Last changedMay 12, 2026Claims8Sources6Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

Duke University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Duke University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # Duke University AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: Duke student-facing AI guidance says whether a student may use AI in coursework depends on instructor permission; unauthorized generative AI use is considered academic misconduct under the Duke Community Standard.
3+Evidence (en, 62ddf7efe141): The answer is: it depends! Per the Duke Community Standard, the unauthorized use of generative AI is considered academic misconduct. However, your instructor may permit or at times ask you to use generative AI in certain circumstances and assignments.
4+academic_integrity: Duke Community Standard academic-dishonesty guidance includes unauthorized use of artificial intelligence software among examples of cheating-related conduct.
5+Evidence (en, 2af7c7e82948): Cheating is the act of wrongfully using or attempting to use unauthorized materials, information, study aids, or the ideas or work of another. It includes, but is not limited to: using, consulting, and/or maintaining unauthorized shared resources including, but not limited to, test banks, solutions materials and/or unauthorized use of artificial intelligence (AI) software
6+ai_tool_treatment: Duke states that it offers a suite of secure and accessible AI platforms to students, staff, and faculty.
7+Evidence (en, 88dc5bf81527): Duke University offers a suite of secure and accessible AI platforms to students, staff, and faculty. Whether you are involved in AI research and development, or want to learn how to start using AI to power your work, Duke is here to help.
8+teaching: Duke CTL guidance tells instructors to update syllabi with clear guidance on generative AI use and says instructors may define how, if, and when generative AI may be used in their courses.
9+Evidence (en, 89f7dd8b3d76): Under the Duke Community Standard, unauthorized use of generative AI is treated as cheating. This means you have the discretion to define how, if, and when generative AI may be used in your courses. All instructors should update their syllabi to include clear guidance on the use of generative AI in their courses.
10+security_review: Duke AI tool guidance describes ChatGPT as available to Duke University faculty, staff, and students, with sensitive-data use excluding PHI and governed by institutional agreement.
11+Evidence (en, 88dc5bf81527): ChatGPT is designed for a broad audience and can be used for general chatbot tasks to streamline your workflow. This includes answering questions, writing, editing, and synthesizing data and ideas. Duke University faculty, staff, and students. Prepaid licenses are provided at no cost to all undergraduate students, as well as faculty, staff, and graduate students in participating units. All other Duke users can purchase a license at a significantly discounted rate. Sensitive (no PHI), (governed by institutional agreement).
12+teaching: Duke CTL assignment-design guidance says AI assignments should be accompanied by course and assignment-specific AI policies, with the primary consideration being whether AI use helps students achieve course learning goals.
13+Evidence (en, 00bacd744f9d): Note, it is critical to develop AI policies for your course along with policies for specific AI assignments. In the development of AI assignments, the primary consideration is whether the use of AI will help your students achieve the learning goals of the course.
14+research: Duke research guidance says researchers should document and publish AI decision-making alongside research and should not cite chatbot-summarized information they have not authenticated.
15+Evidence (en, 0a952988e3f8): Do document and publish your decision-making alongside your research. Don’ts Don’t cite information found or summarized by a chatbot that you haven’t authenticated. Don’t use AI tools that collect, store, or train on user data. Check a tool’s privacy policy; if you’re not sure, contact the tool’s creator.
16+privacy: Duke CTL assignment-design guidance advises that personal information should not be shared when using AI in assignments, to minimize privacy threats to students and instructors.
17+Evidence (en, 00bacd744f9d): There are ethical issues to using AI beyond questions of plagiarism, copyright and academic integrity that should be considered. First, to minimize threats to the privacy of your students and yourself, personal information should not be shared.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

8 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

Duke student-facing AI guidance says whether a student may use AI in coursework depends on instructor permission; unauthorized generative AI use is considered academic misconduct under the Duke Community Standard.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Duke Community Standard academic-dishonesty guidance includes unauthorized use of artificial intelligence software among examples of cheating-related conduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Duke states that it offers a suite of secure and accessible AI platforms to students, staff, and faculty.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Duke CTL guidance tells instructors to update syllabi with clear guidance on generative AI use and says instructors may define how, if, and when generative AI may be used in their courses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Duke AI tool guidance describes ChatGPT as available to Duke University faculty, staff, and students, with sensitive-data use excluding PHI and governed by institutional agreement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Duke CTL assignment-design guidance says AI assignments should be accompanied by course and assignment-specific AI policies, with the primary consideration being whether AI use helps students achieve course learning goals.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Duke research guidance says researchers should document and publish AI decision-making alongside research and should not cite chatbot-summarized information they have not authenticated.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Duke CTL assignment-design guidance advises that personal information should not be shared when using AI in assignments, to minimize privacy threats to students and instructors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen