Durham, United States

University of New Hampshire

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

6 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

UNH's Academic Integrity policy treats unauthorized use or attempted use of AI tools as cheating, and treats computer-generated text or work submitted as one's own without proper citation or attribution as plagiarism.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%

Genormaliseerde waarde: unauthorized_ai_tools_cheating_computer_generated_text_plagiarism

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Cheating: Use or attempted use of any academic exercise materials, information, study aids, electronic data, AI tools, assignment/exam surrogate, or other forms of assistance without authorization. Plagiarism: Use or submission of intellectual property, ideas, evidence produced by another person, including computer generated text or work outsourced to third-parties, in whole or in part as one's own in any academic assessment without providing proper citation or attribution.

Security Review

The USNH Artificial Intelligence Standard, which applies to USNH component institutions, says users of AI tools must not share or enter non-public Tier 2 or higher data, including PII or non-public research data, and that any AI implementation is subject to USNH policies, standards, and security review.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: no_tier2_plus_data_security_review_required

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
This Standard applies to all administrative, academic, and business units at USNH and its component institutions. Users of AI tools or programs must not share or enter any data classified as non-public (Tier 2 data and above), including but not limited to Personally Identifiable information (PII) or non-public research data. Any implementation of artificial intelligence is subject to USNH policies and standards, including the security review process.

Privacy

UNH Provost syllabus guidance says generative-AI detection tools should not be used to make definitive academic-integrity judgments, and says uploading documents containing student names, emails, or ID numbers violates FERPA; faculty using AI-enabled tools to evaluate student work must disclose that use and keep student data protections in mind.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%

Genormaliseerde waarde: ai_detection_not_definitive_ferpa_disclosure

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Turnitin and other software include features that analyze student work for potential plagiarism and use of generative AI tools... They should not be used to make definitive judgments about academic integrity. Further, uploading documents that contain student names, emails, or ID numbers constitutes a violation of FERPA. ChatGPT, Grammarly, Co-Pilot, and other tools may by useful for evaluating the content of student work. You must disclose your use to students.

Ai Tool Treatment

USNH's AI chatbot KB identifies DeepThought and Microsoft Copilot as USNH-provided AI options, recommends signing into Copilot with a USNH account for enterprise data protection, says public chatbots such as ChatGPT and Bard are not secure, and says alternative AI solutions must complete the Security Assessment Review process before purchase or implementation.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%

Genormaliseerde waarde: deepthought_copilot_public_chatbots_sar

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
The platform includes several free language models (LLMs), which keep data private on the USNH network. Copilot is Microsoft's branded chatbot... We recommend signing in with your USNH account to benefit from enterprise data protection. Public platforms like ChatGPT, Bard and others are not secure and pose risks related to data privacy, intellectual property and compliance with cybersecurity standards. Any alternative must successfully complete the Security Assessment Review (SAR) process before purchase or implementation.

Onderwijs

UNH Provost syllabus guidance recommends that instructors explicitly tell students whether automated writing tools and AI tools are allowed in a course, and if allowed, specify how and when they may be used.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: recommended_course_ai_policy_disclosure

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
The university recommends that instructors be very explicit with their students about whether any use of automated writing tools and tools that use artificial intelligence is allowed; and if allowed, be specific about just how and just when.

Source Status

UNH maintains official Teaching & Learning Resource Hub pages for generative AI and academic honesty that point faculty to AI programming, UNH AI-related policies, the Provost syllabus guidance, and an Academic Honesty and AI policy summary; these pages were used as source-status context rather than binding policy by themselves.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen86%

Genormaliseerde waarde: official_teaching_resource_hub_ai_context

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Getting Started with AI Workshop... will also cover UNH's AI-related policies and recommended practices... Workshop: Teaching Without AI... understand UNH's AI policies, and communicate clear expectations around AI use... Workshop: Partnering with AI... review key elements of UNH's AI policies.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen96%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of New Hampshire AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 25, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-new-hampshire

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen