Gothenburg, Sweden

Chalmers University of Technology

Name: Chalmers University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record
Creator: University AI Policy Tracker
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

RanglijstQS World University Rankings 2026: 165Updated15 mei 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

6 reviewed claims

Genormaliseerde waarde: thesis AI-tool use may be permitted with responsibility and transparent disclosure

Laatst gecontroleerd: 15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

You are required to assume full responsibility for your work and must be capable of justifying the choices you've made regarding its content. This includes engaging in discussions about and defending the role AI played in shaping your thesis, demonstrating a clear understanding of how it contributed.
Bron: Regulations for the use of AI tools in thesis work

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Chalmers requires thesis authors to take full responsibility for their work and be able to justify the role AI played.

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: c434a0c2…
Opgehaald: 15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: You are required to assume full responsibility

Genormaliseerde waarde: thesis AI-tool uncertainty around data privacy calls for supervisor or collaborator consultation

Laatst gecontroleerd: 15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

Always consult with your Chalmers’ supervisor or relevant industry/public sector collaborators before using AI tools if you have any uncertainties, particularly concerning data privacy and ethical issues.
Bron: Regulations for the use of AI tools in thesis work

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Chalmers says thesis students should consult a supervisor or collaborator before AI use when data privacy or ethical issues are uncertain.

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: c434a0c2…
Opgehaald: 15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Always consult with your supervisor

Genormaliseerde waarde: student AI use requires transparency and citation in academic-integrity context

Laatst gecontroleerd: 15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

Claiming that what someone else has written is your own text without referencing to it correctly is considered as plagiarism. In relation to AI, this can be interpreted as either plagiarism or ghostwriting, so you need to be fully transparent in your use of AI. Describe what you have done and cite correctly, including which AI tool you have used.
Bron: Using AI as a Student

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Chalmers Library links AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and tells students to be transparent and cite the AI tool used.

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 55616ff3…
Opgehaald: 15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Academic integrity

Genormaliseerde waarde: course-level coordinator and examiner decide examination AI-tool use

Laatst gecontroleerd: 15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

It is up to the coordinator and examiner for each individual course to decide whether and how AI tools are allowed to be used within the framework of the various examinations. Remember to ask at the beginning of each course!
Bron: Using AI as a Student

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Chalmers Library says course coordinators and examiners decide whether and how AI tools are allowed in each course's examinations.

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 55616ff3…
Opgehaald: 15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: The use of genAI can change depending on the course in question

Genormaliseerde waarde: avoid uploading sensitive private copyrighted or unpublished scholarly material to chatbots

Laatst gecontroleerd: 15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

Because of this, you should not upload material that contains sensitive or private information, or any material protected by copyright law, for example PDFs of scientific articles that you’ve downloaded from library databases. If you have text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication, you should not submit it to a chatbot, as doing so may mean relinquishing your copyright to that material.
Bron: Ethical Use of AI

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Chalmers Library cautions against uploading sensitive, private, copyrighted, or unpublished scholarly material to chatbots.

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 2457d2eb…
Opgehaald: 15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Copyright and information safety

Genormaliseerde waarde: students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access; no current Chalmers ChatGPT license

Laatst gecontroleerd: 15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

All students and employees at Chalmers have access to the chatbot Microsoft Copilot. In addition, Chalmers offers Microsoft Copilot Pro licenses to employees who are interested, please contact your immediate manager. Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.
Bron: For Teachers

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Chalmers Library says students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access and that Chalmers does not currently license ChatGPT.

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 74b4f321…
Opgehaald: 15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Chalmers guidelines and resources

Source record

Officiële bronnen

4 sources

Ethical Use of AI

guides.lib.chalmers.se

Bron-URL: https://guides.lib.chalmers.se/aiandchatbots/ethicaluseofai
Snapshot-hash: 2457d2eb…

For Teachers

guides.lib.chalmers.se

Bron-URL: https://guides.lib.chalmers.se/c.php?g=728318&p=5304143
Snapshot-hash: 74b4f321…

Regulations for the use of AI tools in thesis work

chalmers.se

Bron-URL: https://www.chalmers.se/en/education/your-studies/masters-and-bachelors-thesis/regulations-for-the-use-of-ai-tools/
Snapshot-hash: c434a0c2…

Using AI as a Student

guides.lib.chalmers.se

Bron-URL: https://guides.lib.chalmers.se/c.php?g=728318&p=5304140
Snapshot-hash: 55616ff3…

Record information, JSON & citation

Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen95%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Chalmers University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/chalmers-university-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen

Chalmers University of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Beoordeelde beweringen

For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.

For thesis work, Chalmers tells students to consult a Chalmers supervisor or relevant collaborator before using AI tools when there are uncertainties, particularly around data privacy and ethical issues.

Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.

Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.

Chalmers Library's ethical-use guidance says users should not upload sensitive or private information, copyright-protected material, or text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication to chatbots.

Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.

Officiële bronnen

Ethical Use of AI

For Teachers

Regulations for the use of AI tools in thesis work

Using AI as a Student