Wijzigingslogboek

The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) currently has 34 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 4 jun 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney). Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd5Bewijs0Bronsnapshots1Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd0Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) combined release verschil

public-release-20260526-003 vergelijken met public-release-20260612-001.

+17-2
11 # The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: UNSW College says students may use AI for an assessment only when the instructions in the Course Outline permit its use.
5+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): You may use AI for an assessment if the instructions in your Course Outline permit its use.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+ai_tool_treatment: UNSW College recommends Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection as the generative AI platform for coursework or assessment when generative AI use is allowed.
10+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): Where the use of generative AI is allowed as part of coursework and/or assessment, this is the only generative AI platform recommended for UNSW College staff and students.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: UNSW College says students permitted to use AI for an assessment must acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for their course and program.
15+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): If you are permitted to use AI for part or all of your assessment, you must: Acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for your course and program.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+academic_integrity: UNSW College says students cannot use AI for an assessment marked with the Category 1 AI icon, and using AI when prohibited may be penalised as academic misconduct.
20+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): You cannot use AI for an assessment when you see the Category 1 AI icon in your Course Outline under your assessment information. If you choose to use AI for an assessment that prohibits it’s use, you will be penalised for academic misconduct.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: UNSW College says ELICOS students should speak to their teacher about using AI for language-learning support such as writing prompts, chatbot conversation practice, pronunciation feedback, listening practice, and writing feedback.
25+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): If you are enrolled in an English Language Course (e.g., FEEC, UEEC, EAE, TOP), please speak to your teacher about using AI to help you: Generate prompts to practice writing skills and improve vocabulary.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
1227 ## Source snapshot hash changed
1328 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
14-Source https://my.unswcollege.edu.au/student-support/student-ai-guidelines snapshot 480942a7fc762dbe43a517aeae7df90d5d042ca01cb56f314c0cc36bd115dc2a
15-Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
29+Source https://my.unswcollege.edu.au/student-support/student-ai-guidelines snapshot 12ae53670bcd950ebf1e0194c3d1a04cfe914b9cac429beae58530f1f3e9bb07
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z

Geschiedenis releases

1 verschil openbare publicatie

public-release-20260612-001

Vergeleken met public-release-20260526-003.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd5Bronsnapshots1Bron tekst0

The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) public-release-20260612-001 verschil

public-release-20260526-003 vergelijken met public-release-20260612-001.

+17-2
11 # The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: UNSW College says students may use AI for an assessment only when the instructions in the Course Outline permit its use.
5+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): You may use AI for an assessment if the instructions in your Course Outline permit its use.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+ai_tool_treatment: UNSW College recommends Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection as the generative AI platform for coursework or assessment when generative AI use is allowed.
10+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): Where the use of generative AI is allowed as part of coursework and/or assessment, this is the only generative AI platform recommended for UNSW College staff and students.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: UNSW College says students permitted to use AI for an assessment must acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for their course and program.
15+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): If you are permitted to use AI for part or all of your assessment, you must: Acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for your course and program.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+academic_integrity: UNSW College says students cannot use AI for an assessment marked with the Category 1 AI icon, and using AI when prohibited may be penalised as academic misconduct.
20+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): You cannot use AI for an assessment when you see the Category 1 AI icon in your Course Outline under your assessment information. If you choose to use AI for an assessment that prohibits it’s use, you will be penalised for academic misconduct.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: UNSW College says ELICOS students should speak to their teacher about using AI for language-learning support such as writing prompts, chatbot conversation practice, pronunciation feedback, listening practice, and writing feedback.
25+Evidence (en, 12ae53670bcd): If you are enrolled in an English Language Course (e.g., FEEC, UEEC, EAE, TOP), please speak to your teacher about using AI to help you: Generate prompts to practice writing skills and improve vocabulary.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
1227 ## Source snapshot hash changed
1328 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
14-Source https://my.unswcollege.edu.au/student-support/student-ai-guidelines snapshot 480942a7fc762dbe43a517aeae7df90d5d042ca01cb56f314c0cc36bd115dc2a
15-Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z
29+Source https://my.unswcollege.edu.au/student-support/student-ai-guidelines snapshot 12ae53670bcd950ebf1e0194c3d1a04cfe914b9cac429beae58530f1f3e9bb07
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-04T13:10:00.000Z

Aanpassingen claimen

34 Claimen registers

academic_integrity

UNSW College says students may use AI for an assessment only when the instructions in the Course Outline permit its use.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

UNSW College says students permitted to use AI for an assessment must acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for their course and program.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

UNSW College says students cannot use AI for an assessment marked with the Category 1 AI icon, and using AI when prohibited may be penalised as academic misconduct.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%Bewijs1Talenen

ai_tool_treatment

UNSW College recommends Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection as the generative AI platform for coursework or assessment when generative AI use is allowed.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen88%Bewijs1Talenen

teaching

UNSW College says ELICOS students should speak to their teacher about using AI for language-learning support such as writing prompts, chatbot conversation practice, pronunciation feedback, listening practice, and writing feedback.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen86%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW uses a Levels of AI Assistance framework with six categories for assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning or Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen98%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW defines six high-level categories for permitted AI use in assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning/Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%Bewijs1Talenen

other

Under UNSW's 'No Assistance' level, students are not permitted to use any generative AI tools, software, or service to search for or generate information or answers.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%Bewijs1Talenen

other

At UNSW, the unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in assessments is classified as cheating and considered student misconduct under the Code of Conduct and Values.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW has published six AI principles: AI use must benefit UNSW and society; be equitable and respectful of human rights; be trustworthy, safe, and reliable; be transparent; be identifiable, explainable, and contestable; and be secure and resilient.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW's first key principle for AI in assessment requires staff to be honest and transparent about the use of any AI tool where it would reasonably be expected that use of the tool would be disclosed.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW's second key principle for AI in assessment requires that any AI-based output must be reviewed with all due diligence before being released or relied upon, particularly to avoid bias and factual errors.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW states that as a rule, markers must not use AI platforms for marking or grading student work.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW only authorises the use of Turnitin's AI Writing Detection Tool for detecting improper AI use in student work; UNSW IT has not approved other detection tools due to privacy and accuracy concerns.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

Where unauthorised AI use in an assessment is admitted or determined at UNSW, a finding of serious student misconduct is made as a breach of Principle 3 of the Student Code of Conduct, with penalties consistent with Serious Student Misconduct and Serious Plagiarism (typically 00FL for the course, suspension, or exclusion).

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW requires that students must follow assessment instructions regarding AI use, that what students present must be their own work, and that students must acknowledge all sources including AI as an external source using proper referencing.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW College students may only use AI for an assessment if the instructions in the Course Outline permit its use.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW College requires that if AI is permitted for an assessment, students must acknowledge and reference the AI tool using the referencing style for their course and program (e.g., APA Style Referencing 7th edition).

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW penalties for unauthorised AI use in assessments may include a fail grade, a mark of zero for the course, suspension, or permanent exclusion.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW advises students given permission to use AI in assessments to always clearly acknowledge that use when planning, designing, or writing their assessment.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW requires that when ChatGPT or other forms of GenAI are accepted as part of an assessment, academics must ensure the tools are easily accessible for all students with no physical, geographical, or financial restrictions.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW's investigation process for suspected improper AI use involves five steps: initial sense-check, checking signs of AI writing, discussing with the student, contacting the School Student Integrity Adviser (SSIA), and referral to the Conduct & Integrity Office.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW states that students are entitled to use generative AI to the extent specified by course instructions or university rules, and that assessment instructions should set out acceptable use of AI tools.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW College recommends Microsoft Copilot as the only generative AI platform for staff and students, as it provides commercial data protection and is the only platform recommended where generative AI use is allowed in coursework and assessment.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW provides academics with access to Turnitin's AI detection tool for assessments submitted through Moodle Turnitin Assignment or Inspera, but notes this is not always conclusive evidence of improper AI use.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW classifies Grammarly, Quillbot, and translation tools such as Google Translate, DeepL, and Baidu Translate as forms of generative AI.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW advises students not to include any personal or sensitive information in AI prompts, including addresses, names, emails, zID, or intellectual property, and recommends using Microsoft Copilot with a UNSW account for data privacy.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW has developed an AI capability framework for teaching staff covering common knowledge (what is AI, prompts, evaluating outputs), AI governance, ethical and responsible use, assessment and learning, and technology (Microsoft Copilot, Adobe Firefly, Scite.ai).

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW activated Microsoft Copilot with Commercial Data Protection for all staff and students with a zID in May 2024, providing a secure platform where sensitive information is stored and accessed only by authorised staff.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW College permits AI tools for refining writing only when an AI assessment icon indicates it is allowed, for purposes including refining spelling and grammar, revising style and tone, improving clarity, improving vocabulary, checking similarity, assisting proofreading, and self-marking against a rubric.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW warns students that generative AI tools may produce invalid or unreliable information ('fabrications' or 'hallucinations') and advises them to verify the accuracy of AI outputs.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW has an AI leadership group that serves as a clearinghouse for critical issues and strategic initiatives and plays a pivotal role in guiding enterprise decisions on AI.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW has adopted Microsoft Copilot, Adobe Firefly, and Scite.ai as its approved AI tools for staff use.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenen

other

UNSW's AI Leadership Group endorsed and published principles on the Ethical and Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence at UNSW in 2024, designed to regulate AI use, support a positive approach, and promote world-leading AI research.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%Bewijs1Talenen

Bronsnapshots

8 source attributions

UNSW's AI Guidelines and Framework | UNSW Staff Teaching Gateway

official_policy_page Tracker checked at 6 mei 2026, 04:55

Snapshot-hash
57b772b4148fa35277a60538cbc8175d07caf290a51ab057206f4b17b5cf5639