University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Wijzigingslogboek

Universitas Airlangga

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd16 mei 2026Laatst gewijzigd16 mei 2026Claims2Bronnen2Releaseregistraties0
UniversiteitspaginaOpenbaar JSONMaandrapportUniversiteitsindex

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

Universitas Airlangga currently has 2 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Universitas Airlangga. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd0Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd0Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

Universitas Airlangga combined release verschil

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+4-0
11 # Universitas Airlangga AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: UNAIR's Jurnal Hubungan Internasional author guidance requires manuscripts to include an artificial-intelligence tool usage declaration in the acknowledgments section and says authors must identify either use or non-use of AI tools.
3+Evidence (en, 2247831df252): As part of our policy, all authors are required to include a declaration regarding artificial intelligence tool usage in their manuscripts. This declaration should be placed in the acknowledgments section.
4+ai_tool_treatment: UNAIR's JPUA editorial policy allows responsible generative-AI use to improve language quality and readability with mandatory human supervision, but it does not recognize LLMs or other AI tools as authors or co-authors and requires disclosure when AI tools are used in manuscript preparation.
5+Evidence (en, 33e522ca3c02): JPUA supports responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, particularly generative AI, to enhance language quality and readability, provided that human supervision remains mandatory. JPUA does not recognize Large Language Models (LLMs)—such as ChatGPT—or any AI tool as authors or co-authors. If an LLM or other AI tool is used at any stage of manuscript preparation, the authors are required to clearly and transparently disclose the extent and purpose of AI use.

Geschiedenis releases

0 public release diffs

Aanpassingen claimen

2 Claimen registers

ai_tool_treatment

UNAIR's Jurnal Hubungan Internasional author guidance requires manuscripts to include an artificial-intelligence tool usage declaration in the acknowledgments section and says authors must identify either use or non-use of AI tools.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen88%Bewijs1Talenen

ai_tool_treatment

UNAIR's JPUA editorial policy allows responsible generative-AI use to improve language quality and readability with mandatory human supervision, but it does not recognize LLMs or other AI tools as authors or co-authors and requires disclosure when AI tools are used in manuscript preparation.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen87%Bewijs1Talenen

Bronsnapshots

2 source attributions