University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Universitas Airlangga

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims2Sources2
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universitas Airlangga currently has 2 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Universitas Airlangga current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+4-0
11 # Universitas Airlangga AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: UNAIR's Jurnal Hubungan Internasional author guidance requires manuscripts to include an artificial-intelligence tool usage declaration in the acknowledgments section and says authors must identify either use or non-use of AI tools.
3+Evidence (en, 2247831df252): As part of our policy, all authors are required to include a declaration regarding artificial intelligence tool usage in their manuscripts. This declaration should be placed in the acknowledgments section.
4+ai_tool_treatment: UNAIR's JPUA editorial policy allows responsible generative-AI use to improve language quality and readability with mandatory human supervision, but it does not recognize LLMs or other AI tools as authors or co-authors and requires disclosure when AI tools are used in manuscript preparation.
5+Evidence (en, 33e522ca3c02): JPUA supports responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, particularly generative AI, to enhance language quality and readability, provided that human supervision remains mandatory. JPUA does not recognize Large Language Models (LLMs)—such as ChatGPT—or any AI tool as authors or co-authors. If an LLM or other AI tool is used at any stage of manuscript preparation, the authors are required to clearly and transparently disclose the extent and purpose of AI use.

Claim changes

2 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

UNAIR's Jurnal Hubungan Internasional author guidance requires manuscripts to include an artificial-intelligence tool usage declaration in the acknowledgments section and says authors must identify either use or non-use of AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UNAIR's JPUA editorial policy allows responsible generative-AI use to improve language quality and readability with mandatory human supervision, but it does not recognize LLMs or other AI tools as authors or co-authors and requires disclosure when AI tools are used in manuscript preparation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

2 source attributions