University AI Policy Tracker

Open, op bewijs gebaseerde AI-beleidsrecords van universiteiten voor publiek hergebruik.

APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Stockholm University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims6Sources4Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Stockholm University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Stockholm University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Stockholm University combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Stockholm University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance says suspected unauthorized AI-chatbot use in an examination should be investigated and, if there is well-founded suspicion of cheating, reported in the same way as other cheating cases.
3+Evidence (en, 03b82dbd92f5): If it is suspected that a student has used an AI chatbot in an unauthorized way in connection with an examination, the offense must be investigated, and, if there is a well-founded suspicion of cheating, reported in the same way as in other cases of cheating.
4+privacy: Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.
5+Evidence (en, 88a1c19622f9): As long as you are signed in to Microsoft 365 with your university account, data protection for Copilot is enabled and nothing you enter into the chat is used to train the model Copilot is based on. However, this does not mean you are allowed to enter information with confidentiality level 3 or 4 into Copilot.
6+teaching: Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance recommends that teachers and examiners decide what AI-chatbot use is allowed or impermissible, noting that this may differ from course to course.
7+Evidence (en, 03b82dbd92f5): Stockholm University therefore recommends that teachers/examiners need to decide which type of use is allowed, and which is considered impermissible, which may differ from course to course.
8+academic_integrity: Stockholm Business School says use of generative AI in examinations or mandatory assignments is prohibited unless explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions.
9+Evidence (en, 3d53a4f43b46): Any use of generative AI (e.g. ChatGPT) during examinations or mandatory assignments, beyond what is explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions, is prohibited. A student who uses generative AI in their work or writing in any way not explicitly permitted may be suspected of attempting to deceive.
10+academic_integrity: DSV's AI policy authorizes students enrolled at DSV to use AI tools for learning support and exam preparation, while requiring proper references and a description when AI-generated text, models, or code are used in submissions.
11+Evidence (en, 35b551b55df5): Students are authorized to utilize AI tools to enhance their understanding of scientific knowledge. This includes employing AI tools to support their learning, improve communication, and enhance their writing skills. It is prohibited for students to claim ownership of AI tool-generated texts, models, or code without proper references to the utilized AI tools. Any submission must include a description of how these AI tools were employed.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Stockholm University's AI resources page says the university has chosen not to implement a mandatory policy for AI tools and that usual regulations and employee judgment apply.
13+Evidence (en, 88a1c19622f9): Stockholm University has chosen not to implement a mandatory policy for the use of AI tools, partly due to the very rapid development, and partly because different disciplines have widely varying needs and conditions. Our usual regulations and the employee's judgment apply, just as for other digital tools.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

academic_integrity

Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance says suspected unauthorized AI-chatbot use in an examination should be investigated and, if there is well-founded suspicion of cheating, reported in the same way as other cheating cases.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance recommends that teachers and examiners decide what AI-chatbot use is allowed or impermissible, noting that this may differ from course to course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Stockholm Business School says use of generative AI in examinations or mandatory assignments is prohibited unless explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

DSV's AI policy authorizes students enrolled at DSV to use AI tools for learning support and exam preparation, while requiring proper references and a description when AI-generated text, models, or code are used in submissions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Stockholm University's AI resources page says the university has chosen not to implement a mandatory policy for AI tools and that usual regulations and employee judgment apply.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions