Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.
Nieuwe tekst
Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.
SJTU’s2025 trial framework classifies uses as prohibited, limited, encouraged or open; students must follow each course’s AI rules. Teachers publish scope and citation formats through syllabus/class/grading rules. Categories are not permission for every assignment or exam.
Vermelding van gebruik · Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 toegevoegd)
Registeraanvulling
Toegevoegd
+
Students should mark and cite necessary information about AI tools; the instructor explains applicable citation templates and permitted uses. Citation does not authorize prohibited use.
The trial framework forbids privacy violations and information theft in AI development/use contexts and requires school approval or filing when using school public data. It does not establish a full vendor-training or retention matrix.
SJTU Xflops documents a locally deployed DeepSeek service supported by Xflops/Network Information Center, with named models. Eligibility, price, vendor/log retention and task authorization are not established by the listing.
Onderzoek en publicatie · Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 toegevoegd)
Registeraanvulling
Toegevoegd
+
The2025 graduate academic standards have a separate research/degree misconduct and review framework for current postgraduates and prior SJTU postgraduate degree holders. They do not grant blanket AI thesis/publication permission.
Students must follow the AI-use rules specified for each course and comply with teaching plans, intellectual-property requirements and academic integrity. SJTU’s separate teaching-center guide offers teacher-facing examples; it is not itself a university-wide disciplinary offence list.
The2024 integrity code states five-working-day objections after notification and refers disciplinary appeals to the student appeal rules. Separately,2025 discipline and2017 appeal texts use different deadlines. Their cross-document priority remains unresolved here; preserve the decision and seek the applicable route rather than merging clocks.
The2024 academic-integrity code supersedes2021. Dishonesty in an assignment/lab assessment results in zero for that component; repeated dishonesty in one course gives a course zero. The retake maximum60 applies when dishonesty led to disciplinary punishment, not every AI use. Joint programmes may have separately filed rules.
The2025 disciplinary process gives students an opportunity to respond; a hearing may be requested within three working days from receipt of the proposed disciplinary decision. This is a proposed-decision hearing clock, not the final-decision appeal deadline.
Teachers carry primary responsibility for AI-supported design, explain use scope and risks, and provide testing/filing where necessary. This does not approve every external product.
Teachers are primarily responsible for AI-supported teaching design. They must observe applicable educational rules, specify scenarios and risks, provide testing/validation reports and filing when necessary, and explain course AI scope and AI-generated-content citation formats to students; SJTU may pursue responsibility for unregistered or risky tools.
DeepSeek 本地版 is listed for Shanghai Jiao Tong University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
+
Nieuwe tekst
Official SJTU Xflops materials list a locally deployed DeepSeek service, supported by the Xflops team and the Network Information Center, with DeepSeek/Qwen models. The page does not establish eligibility, price, retention or assessment permission.
SJTU’s 2025 trial guidance classifies educational AI uses as prohibited, limited, encouraged or open. Specific scenario conditions and lists must be checked separately; the categories are not a blanket permission.
Voor deze revisie is nog geen onafhankelijk gecontroleerde samenvatting beschikbaar.
Deze historische samenvatting bevestigt geen huidige toestemming of nieuwe universiteitsregel.
Regels voor AI-tools · Betrokken gegevens: 3 (1 toegevoegd)
Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld
Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.
Oude tekst
AI 应用平台 is listed for Shanghai Jiao Tong University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
DeepSeek 本地版 is listed for Shanghai Jiao Tong University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.
Oude tekst
DeepSeek 本地版 is listed for Shanghai Jiao Tong University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
Voor deze revisie is nog geen onafhankelijk gecontroleerde samenvatting beschikbaar.
Deze historische samenvatting bevestigt geen huidige toestemming of nieuwe universiteitsregel.
Regels voor AI-tools · Betrokken gegevens: 2 (2 toegevoegd)
Registeraanvulling
Toegevoegd
+
AI 应用平台 is listed for Shanghai Jiao Tong University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.
DeepSeek 本地版 is listed for Shanghai Jiao Tong University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.