academic_integrity
Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Lomonosov Moscow State University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
7 claim records
Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.
The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.
Lomonosov Moscow State University's Economics Faculty has Russian-language rules defining general conditions for use of generative AI tools by students and employees in the faculty's educational process.
The Economics Faculty rules place responsibility on students for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results, and treat unchecked use of AI results as an academic-ethics violation.
The Economics Faculty rules state that violating AI-tool rules is an academic-ethics violation; if improper AI use without real mastery is found, a teacher may annul the work result and report the violation to faculty administration.
The Economics Faculty rules say AI-tool use is permitted by default and that the faculty supports effective, ethical, and transparent AI use for course work, term papers, and final qualification works.
The Economics Faculty rules require teachers who use AI tools when creating materials or other work to explicitly declare that use, including the AI model, work parts, and purposes and methods of use.
5 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 4:36 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 4:36 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 4:36 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 4:37 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 4:38 AM