privacy
Georgia State guidance says faculty, staff, and students may not submit directly identifying data or university Sensitive or Confidential data into AI tools that are not supported by Georgia State.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Georgia State University
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Georgia State University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
6 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Georgia State University has an active AI Policy addressing ethical, responsible, and secure AI use in academic and operational contexts, and the policy applies to Georgia State faculty, staff, and students.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Georgia State guidance says tools used for processes involving Sensitive or Confidential university data should not be used without contract review of data processing, privacy, and security before use.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Georgia State's AI tools page identifies university-licensed AI-capable tools and lists DeepSeek and uncontracted meeting recording, transcription, and notetaking tools as prohibited or disallowed by policy or guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Georgia State CETLOE guidance says instructors set boundaries for student use of generative AI tools in a course and should provide assignment-specific guidance because AI expectations may vary by graded item.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Georgia State CETLOE's suggested syllabus language says unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
AI in Teaching and Learning
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:40 AM
AI Policy
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:43 AM
AI Tools
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:45 AM
Guidance on Generative AI and Data Integrity, Privacy, and Security
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:40 AM