Change log

University of Minho

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Minho currently has 2 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Minho. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Minho combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+4-0
11 # University of Minho AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: An official UMinho SASUM notice says the University of Minho community has free protected access to IAedu in a pilot phase, can authenticate with institutional credentials, and that the initiative is framed as responsible and secure because data are not used to train AI language models.
3+Evidence (pt-PT, da9b2b8e234a): A Universidade do Minho aderiu ao projeto IAedu ... que nesta fase-piloto garante a toda a nossa Comunidade o acesso gratuito e protegido a várias ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial a partir de um só portal. Os membros desta Academia podem aceder a chat.iaedu.pt, selecionar o logótipo da UMinho, autenticar-se com as respetivas credenciais institucionais ... Esta iniciativa visa democratizar o uso da IA, sendo baseada numa política de utilização responsável ... e segura (os dados não são usados para treino dos modelos de linguagem IA).
4+research: University of Minho Open Science guidance summarizes responsible generative-AI use in research, including human responsibility for research outputs, reporting generative-AI use, avoiding import of sensitive information into AI tools, and not using these tools for tasks with direct impact on third parties such as peer review or proposal evaluation.
5+Evidence (pt-PT, 39396f4e0cc4): As recomendações são dirigidas a 3 atores – investigadores, organizações de investigação e financiadores – e têm um pendor muito prático, desde logo destacando que os seres humanos (e não a IA) são responsáveis pelos resultados de investigação ... o uso de ferramentas de IA generativa deve ser reportado; informação sensível não deve ser importada para ferramentas de IA ... e que estas ferramentas não devem ser usadas para tarefas com impacto direto em terceiros, ex. revisão por pares e avaliação de propostas de investigação.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

2 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

An official UMinho SASUM notice says the University of Minho community has free protected access to IAedu in a pilot phase, can authenticate with institutional credentials, and that the initiative is framed as responsible and secure because data are not used to train AI language models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagespt-PT

research

University of Minho Open Science guidance summarizes responsible generative-AI use in research, including human responsibility for research outputs, reporting generative-AI use, avoiding import of sensitive information into AI tools, and not using these tools for tasks with direct impact on third parties such as peer review or proposal evaluation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagespt-PT

Source snapshots

2 source attributions