University AI Policy Tracker

Rekod dasar AI universiti yang terbuka dan berasaskan bukti untuk kegunaan awam.

APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Universität Potsdam

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims7Sources5Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universität Potsdam currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Universität Potsdam. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Universität Potsdam combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+14-0
11 # Universität Potsdam AI policy record
2+privacy: The position paper says students and teaching staff cannot be obliged or asked to use ChatGPT unless technical and organizational measures prevent OpenAI from processing their personal data, and prompts must not contain personal or confidential university information.
3+Evidence (de, 6f586be44bef): Dies bedeutet, dass Studierende und Lehrende nicht verpflichtet oder gebeten werden können, ChatGPT einzusetzen, es sei denn, es kann durch technische und organisatorische Maßnahmen sichergestellt werden, dass ihre personenbezogenen Daten bei der Nutzung durch OpenAI nicht verarbeitet werden können.
4+teaching: Universität Potsdam's adopted AI teaching position paper supports the use of generative AI in teaching so students can develop reflective use for future professional practice.
5+Evidence (de, 6f586be44bef): Grundsätzlich befürwortet die Universität Potsdam den Einsatz auch von generativer KI in der Lehre, um einen reflektierten Einsatz für die zukünftige Berufspraxis der Studierenden zu gewährleisten.
6+academic_integrity: The 2026 AI-and-examinations handbook states that AI detectors are not reliable and do not provide legally secure proof of deception.
7+Evidence (de, e04d7e66bbc2): KI-Detektoren sind nicht zuverlässig und liefern keine rechtssicheren Beweise, da sie lediglich die statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit bewerten.
8+ai_tool_treatment: The official e-assessment AI page says using AI such as GPT.UP may not be a condition for passing an assessment, and AI should not be used by instructors for full creation and grading of summative examinations.
9+Evidence (de, 9b6323dbe43a): Der Einsatz von KI (wie z.B. GPT.UP) darf keine Bedingung zum Bestehen einer Prüfungsleistung sein. KI (wie z.B. GPT.UP) sollte von Lehrenden nicht zur vollumfänglichen Erstellung und Bewertung summativer Prüfungen verwendet werden.
10+academic_integrity: The 2026 AI-and-examinations handbook advises examiners to state early and in writing whether and how AI may be used in a course and assessment, and to use transparency rules when AI is allowed or cannot be explicitly excluded.
11+Evidence (de, e04d7e66bbc2): Es ist daher notwendig, frühzeitig (idealerweise zu Semesterbeginn) und schriftlich zu präzisieren, ob und in welcher Form KI in der Lehrveranstaltung und in der Prüfung verwendet werden darf.
12+ai_tool_treatment: The official GPT.UP page says GPT.UP has been available to all members of the University of Potsdam since 14 October 2024, with login through the UP account.
13+Evidence (de, c5a9daee7395): GPT.UP wurde am Montag, den 14.10.2024, freigeschaltet und steht seitdem allen Angehörigen der UP zur Verfügung. Der Login erfolgt über den UP-Account.
14+privacy: The ZfQ AI-in-teaching page says GPT.UP is available to University of Potsdam members and that its use ensures AI providers do not process students' personal data and student data is processed only for university-defined teaching purposes.
15+Evidence (de, 45503409eaa2): GPT.UP steht allen Angehörigen der Universität Potsdam zur Verfügung. Die Verwendung stellt sicher, dass die KI-Anbieter keine personenbezogenen Daten der Studierenden (Login-Daten, Metadaten) verarbeiten.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

The position paper says students and teaching staff cannot be obliged or asked to use ChatGPT unless technical and organizational measures prevent OpenAI from processing their personal data, and prompts must not contain personal or confidential university information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesde

teaching

Universität Potsdam's adopted AI teaching position paper supports the use of generative AI in teaching so students can develop reflective use for future professional practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

The 2026 AI-and-examinations handbook states that AI detectors are not reliable and do not provide legally secure proof of deception.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

The official e-assessment AI page says using AI such as GPT.UP may not be a condition for passing an assessment, and AI should not be used by instructors for full creation and grading of summative examinations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

The 2026 AI-and-examinations handbook advises examiners to state early and in writing whether and how AI may be used in a course and assessment, and to use transparency rules when AI is allowed or cannot be explicitly excluded.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

The official GPT.UP page says GPT.UP has been available to all members of the University of Potsdam since 14 October 2024, with login through the UP account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

The ZfQ AI-in-teaching page says GPT.UP is available to University of Potsdam members and that its use ensures AI providers do not process students' personal data and student data is processed only for university-defined teaching purposes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

5 source attributions