Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
claim-une-hdr-ai-misconduct-risks
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
tools including computer programs, artificial intelligence tools or other tools should NOT be used to write, or produce, any part of your assessment response unless it has been explicitly referenced and in line with advice by the unit coordinator in your assessment task.
A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.
Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
claim-une-hdr-ai-misconduct-risks
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
This Policy applies to all students enrolled in undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award courses offered by UNE... The Policy does not apply to higher degree by research courses. Breaches... include... work substantially written by someone else... artificial intelligence tool, or other tool.
UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.
tools including computer programs, artificial intelligence tools or other tools should NOT be used to write, or produce, any part of your assessment response unless it has been explicitly referenced and in line with advice by the unit coordinator in your assessment task.
A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.
In the planning of a research project, HDR candidates are required to consider the ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of all content generated by AI tools and sources that you use.
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance says higher degree research candidates are required to consider ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of content generated by AI tools and sources they use.
claim-une-hdr-ai-acknowledgement
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
claim-une-hdr-ai-misconduct-risks
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
claim-une-hdr-ai-misconduct-risks
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
Inputting any research data into AI, is at the risk of losing copyright/intellectual property rights... This could have significant ramifications... if you inadvertently release sensitive or highly sensitive data.
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance cautions that inputting research data into AI can risk loss of copyright or intellectual property control and can have serious implications if sensitive or highly sensitive data is inadvertently released.
tools including computer programs, artificial intelligence tools or other tools should NOT be used to write, or produce, any part of your assessment response unless it has been explicitly referenced and in line with advice by the unit coordinator in your assessment task.
A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.
In the planning of a research project, HDR candidates are required to consider the ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of all content generated by AI tools and sources that you use.
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance says higher degree research candidates are required to consider ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of content generated by AI tools and sources they use.
claim-une-hdr-ai-acknowledgement
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
claim-une-hdr-ai-misconduct-risks
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
Inputting any research data into AI, is at the risk of losing copyright/intellectual property rights... This could have significant ramifications... if you inadvertently release sensitive or highly sensitive data.
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance cautions that inputting research data into AI can risk loss of copyright or intellectual property control and can have serious implications if sensitive or highly sensitive data is inadvertently released.
This Policy applies to all students enrolled in undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award courses offered by UNE... The Policy does not apply to higher degree by research courses. Breaches... include... work substantially written by someone else... artificial intelligence tool, or other tool.
UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.
Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
claim-une-hdr-ai-misconduct-risks
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
This Policy applies to all students enrolled in undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award courses offered by UNE... The Policy does not apply to higher degree by research courses. Breaches... include... work substantially written by someone else... artificial intelligence tool, or other tool.
UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.
Discover Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE and learn UNE's stance and how you can ethically use Generative AI... Generative AI Modules: What is Generative AI? General Principles for Use of Generative AI. TurnItIn Detection and AI. Referencing Generative AI. Example Case Study.
UNE's public Learning Online academic integrity myLearn section states that a Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE module exists and lists module topics including general principles for use of generative AI, Turnitin detection and AI, and referencing generative AI.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
Teaching guidanceUniversity of New England Australia
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Security and procurement
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementUniversity of New England Australia
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Record updatesLast 90 days
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
6 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 2 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%
Normalized value: HDR GenAI non-acknowledgement and specified uses may raise misconduct risks
Last checked
May 24, 2026
Last changed
May 24, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
239a1519…
Retrieved
May 24, 2026
Evidence locator
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
Academic Integrity
UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Normalized value: AI tools included in coursework academic integrity breach examples; HDR excluded from this policy
Last checked
May 24, 2026
Last changed
May 24, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
This Policy applies to all students enrolled in undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award courses offered by UNE... The Policy does not apply to higher degree by research courses. Breaches... include... work substantially written by someone else... artificial intelligence tool, or other tool.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
85819002…
Retrieved
May 24, 2026
Evidence locator
Section 1 clauses 2 and 9.02
Privacy 1 reviewed claim
Privacy
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance cautions that inputting research data into AI can risk loss of copyright or intellectual property control and can have serious implications if sensitive or highly sensitive data is inadvertently released.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Normalized value: HDR research data input to AI is flagged as privacy/IP risk
Last checked
May 24, 2026
Last changed
May 24, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Inputting any research data into AI, is at the risk of losing copyright/intellectual property rights... This could have significant ramifications... if you inadvertently release sensitive or highly sensitive data.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
239a1519…
Retrieved
May 24, 2026
Evidence locator
The nature of your research project
Research 1 reviewed claim
Research
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance says higher degree research candidates are required to consider ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of content generated by AI tools and sources they use.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Normalized value: HDR candidates must acknowledge and cite generative AI use
Last checked
May 24, 2026
Last changed
May 24, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
In the planning of a research project, HDR candidates are required to consider the ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of all content generated by AI tools and sources that you use.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
239a1519…
Retrieved
May 24, 2026
Evidence locator
Should HDR candidates use Generative AI in Research?
AI tool use 1 reviewed claim
Ai Tool Treatment
A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%
Normalized value: School of Education page: AI assessment use requires explicit referencing and unit coordinator advice
Last checked
May 24, 2026
Last changed
May 24, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
tools including computer programs, artificial intelligence tools or other tools should NOT be used to write, or produce, any part of your assessment response unless it has been explicitly referenced and in line with advice by the unit coordinator in your assessment task.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d22272d1…
Retrieved
May 24, 2026
Evidence locator
School of Education Information Site page text
Source Status 1 reviewed claim
Source Status
UNE's public Learning Online academic integrity myLearn section states that a Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE module exists and lists module topics including general principles for use of generative AI, Turnitin detection and AI, and referencing generative AI.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%
Normalized value: Public myLearn source confirms GenAI academic integrity module topics, but full module content is separate
Last checked
May 24, 2026
Last changed
May 24, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
Discover Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE and learn UNE's stance and how you can ethically use Generative AI... Generative AI Modules: What is Generative AI? General Principles for Use of Generative AI. TurnItIn Detection and AI. Referencing Generative AI. Example Case Study.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
4ac68cdd…
Retrieved
May 24, 2026
Evidence locator
Academic Integrity section, Generative AI Modules
Source record
Official sources
4 sources
4 official URLs; 4 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Academic Integrity | Learning Online at UNE
mylearn.une.edu.au
University official source
mylearn.une.edu.au
Hash and captured version
Academic Integrity | Learning Online at UNE · 2026-05-24T14:27:23.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of New England Australia AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 24, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-new-england-australia
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
University of New England Australia has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
