Sydney, Australia Last checked Oct 20, 2026

The University of Sydney

Independent · Open access · Not an official university page

What would you like to check?

Can I use AI for my coursework?Open: allowed; secure: generally not Do I need to disclose AI use?Acknowledgement required Can I upload sensitive data?Do not input protected material Which tools can I access?Copilot for all; others scoped

Use in ChatGPT ↗Before you submitAdvice and precautions Record updates ↓

Explore the current record by topic

Coursework

Open: allowed; secure: generally not

Each unit outline has a 'Use of AI' column for every assessment. AI can be used in open (unsupervised) assessments, where educators guide appropriate use and use must be acknowledged; it generally cannot be used in secure (supervised) assessments unless the unit coordinator expressly permits it. These coursework rules do not apply to HDR theses.

Official source ↗

Exams

Secure assessments: AI generally prohibited

Secure (supervised) assessments, such as secure exams, generally prohibit AI unless the unit coordinator gives express permission in the unit outline; using AI where prohibited can breach the Academic Integrity Policy.

Official source ↗

Disclosure

Acknowledgement required

AI used in assessments must be acknowledged, including AI translation, paraphrasing or referencing tools; basic spelling/grammar correction and word processing are exempt. The statement gives the tool name and version, publisher, URL and how it was used; coordinators may require logs. HDR theses must include an AI statement even if no AI was used.

Official source ↗

Privacy & sensitive data

Do not input protected material

Do not enter confidential, personal, proprietary or otherwise sensitive information into AI tools. Inputting University teaching or course materials, other students' work, external partners' intellectual property or anyone's personal or health information counts as misuse. HDR students must never upload personal, sensitive or confidential information to any AI tool.

Official source ↗

Institutional tools

Copilot for all; others scoped

Microsoft Copilot Chat is free for all students and is the go-to option when signed in via Okta (only some highly protected data). Cogniti agents are provided through units; Harvey AI is for Sydney Law School students only. ChatGPT Edu is not yet generally available: a student pilot is planned for October 2026 and release to all students in Semester 1 2027, with agents and connectors assessed before enabling. Tool access does not override an assessment's AI rules.

Official source ↗

Research & publication

HDR: stricter rules

HDR (research degree) students may use AI for spelling and grammar but not to generate content, rewrite drafts' academic language or include AI output as substantive thesis content, unless AI is integral to the approved research methodology (supervisor approval and ethics arrangements). Theses need an AI statement and students should keep prompts and outputs.

Official source ↗

Academic integrity & procedures

Breach procedures apply

Inappropriately generating content with AI is an academic integrity breach and AI-generated submissions may be treated as contract cheating. Turnitin's AI detector may be used, but its score is never the only evidence. Minor breaches may be handled by the unit coordinator, more serious ones by the faculty Educational Integrity team, and the most serious by the Registrar. Academic decisions: faculty/Academic Panel review within 20 working days, then SAB within 15 working days; Registrar misconduct penalties: SDAC appeal within 20 working days.

Official source ↗

Teaching guidance

Recommended

The University of Sydney recommends a two-lane assessment framework to guide teaching and assessment design in the age of generative AI: Lane 1 assures learning through secured, in-person assessments where generative AI may or may not be allowed by the examiner, while Lane 2 scaffolds and supports relevant generative AI use in open assessments; under the Assessment Procedures, unit of study coordinators specify for each assessment whether and which AI tools are permitted and how use must be acknowledged.

Official source ↗

Security and procurement

Unclear

Central IT security evaluation protocols, vendor data privacy impact assessments, and institutional procurement standards for third-party generative AI platforms are not verified in current reviewed university records.

Do

Check the 'Use of AI' column in your unit outline for each assessment: open assessments allow AI with acknowledgement; secure ones generally do not.
Requirement in this scope
Check the 'Use of AI' column in your unit outline for each assessment: open assessments allow AI with acknowledgement; secure ones generally do not.
Scope
University of Sydney student AI guidance (updated 2 June 2026); academic integrity, investigation and appeals pages; Graduate Research HDR AI guidance; Teaching@Sydney assessment framework; ChatGPT Edu and Student IT pages. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.
The University of Sydney's current student guidance (last updated 2 June 2026) says students can use AI in open (unsupervised) assessments, where educators guide the appropriate types of use and AI use must be acknowledged, but generally cannot use AI in secure (supervised) assessments unless the unit coordinator has given express permission in the unit outline. Each unit outline has a 'Use of AI' column showing, per assessment, AI prohibited, AI allowed, AI limited, or not applicable. This replaces the earlier Semester 1 2025 transition wording.
Original evidence and scope
The University of Sydney's current student guidance (last updated 2 June 2026) says students can use AI in open (unsupervised) assessments, where educators guide the appropriate types of use and AI use must be acknowledged, but generally cannot use AI in secure (supervised) assessments unless the unit coordinator has given express permission in the unit outline. Each unit outline has a 'Use of AI' column showing, per assessment, AI prohibited, AI allowed, AI limited, or not applicable. This replaces the earlier Semester 1 2025 transition wording.
usyd-claim-3
Your unit outline includes a "Use of AI" column to indicate whether you can use AI or not for each assessment.
Unit of study outlines; lines 39-39 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
You can use AI in open (unsupervised) assessments. These assessments support the development of disciplinary knowledge, as well as AI literacy. As such, you're encouraged to use AI tools productively and responsibly as part of your learning experience.
Allowed use; lines 55-55 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
When you submit an open assessment, you'll need to appropriately acknowledge AI use so as not to breach academic integrity.
Allowed use; lines 59-59 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
You generally can't use AI in secure (supervised) assessments, unless the unit coordinator has given express permission in the unit outline. Using AI when not allowed could amount to a breach of academic integrity, for which you could be investigated.
Prohibited use; lines 65-65 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
Acknowledge AI use with the tool name and version, publisher, URL and how you used it; spelling/grammar-only tools are exempt.
Requirement in this scope
Acknowledge AI use with the tool name and version, publisher, URL and how you used it; spelling/grammar-only tools are exempt.
Scope
University of Sydney student AI guidance (updated 2 June 2026); academic integrity, investigation and appeals pages; Graduate Research HDR AI guidance; Teaching@Sydney assessment framework; ChatGPT Edu and Student IT pages. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.
If University of Sydney students use AI in assessments they must acknowledge it, including generative AI translation, paraphrasing or referencing tools; tools used only for word processing or basic spelling and grammar correction need not be acknowledged. Where permitted by the unit outline, the statement must say that AI tools were used and give the tool's name and version, the publisher, the URL and a brief description of how it was used; unit coordinators may add requirements such as a log of AI inputs and outputs.
Original evidence and scope
If University of Sydney students use AI in assessments they must acknowledge it, including generative AI translation, paraphrasing or referencing tools; tools used only for word processing or basic spelling and grammar correction need not be acknowledged. Where permitted by the unit outline, the statement must say that AI tools were used and give the tool's name and version, the publisher, the URL and a brief description of how it was used; unit coordinators may add requirements such as a log of AI inputs and outputs.
usyd-claim-8
If you use AI in your assessments, you're required to acknowledge it – this includes acknowledging any tools that use generative AI, such as translation tools, paraphrasing tools or referencing tools. You are not required to acknowledge tools used for word processing, or which only correct basic spelling and grammar.
Acknowledging AI use; lines 89-89 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
If you're permitted to use automated writing tools or generative AI as per the unit outline, you will need to include a statement in your submitted work explaining: that you have used AI tools in completing the work the name and version of the automated writing or generative AI tools you have used the publisher the uniform resource locator (URL) and a brief description of how you have used them.
What you need to provide; lines 95-105 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
If your unit coordinator has made any additional stipulations about how they want the class to acknowledge AI use, you should also follow these rules. For example, they may require you to submit a log of the AI inputs and outputs used during the preparation of your assessment.
What you need to provide; lines 107-107 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
HDR students: include an AI statement in your thesis (even if you used none) and keep your prompts and outputs.
Requirement in this scope
HDR students: include an AI statement in your thesis (even if you used none) and keep your prompts and outputs.
Scope
University of Sydney student AI guidance (updated 2 June 2026); academic integrity, investigation and appeals pages; Graduate Research HDR AI guidance; Teaching@Sydney assessment framework; ChatGPT Edu and Student IT pages. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.
All University of Sydney theses should contain a statement acknowledging any use of generative AI, and if no generative AI was used the thesis should still include a statement to that effect. HDR students who use generative AI in their research or thesis should document all prompts and keep records of generated outputs.
Original evidence and scope
All University of Sydney theses should contain a statement acknowledging any use of generative AI, and if no generative AI was used the thesis should still include a statement to that effect. HDR students who use generative AI in their research or thesis should document all prompts and keep records of generated outputs.
draft-claim-usyd-hdr-thesis-ai-statement
All theses should contain an acknowledgement section, an author attribution statement and a statement that acknowledges any use of generative artificial intelligence (AI).
Thesis content; lines 201-201 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
Any generative AI tools that you have used in your research or in any part of the preparation of your thesis should be acknowledged. If you did not use generative AI, then you should still include a statement to this effect.
Generative AI statement; lines 352-352 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
You should also document (such as by taking screenshots of) all prompts that you input into any gen AI tool, and keep records of all generated outputs.
Guidelines for acknowledging use of gen AI; lines 356-356 of captured page text
Official university source ↗

Don’t

Do not use AI in secure assessments unless the unit outline expressly allows it.
Requirement in this scope
Do not use AI in secure assessments unless the unit outline expressly allows it.
Scope
University of Sydney student AI guidance (updated 2 June 2026); academic integrity, investigation and appeals pages; Graduate Research HDR AI guidance; Teaching@Sydney assessment framework; ChatGPT Edu and Student IT pages. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.
The University of Sydney's current student guidance (last updated 2 June 2026) says students can use AI in open (unsupervised) assessments, where educators guide the appropriate types of use and AI use must be acknowledged, but generally cannot use AI in secure (supervised) assessments unless the unit coordinator has given express permission in the unit outline. Each unit outline has a 'Use of AI' column showing, per assessment, AI prohibited, AI allowed, AI limited, or not applicable. This replaces the earlier Semester 1 2025 transition wording.
Original evidence and scope
The University of Sydney's current student guidance (last updated 2 June 2026) says students can use AI in open (unsupervised) assessments, where educators guide the appropriate types of use and AI use must be acknowledged, but generally cannot use AI in secure (supervised) assessments unless the unit coordinator has given express permission in the unit outline. Each unit outline has a 'Use of AI' column showing, per assessment, AI prohibited, AI allowed, AI limited, or not applicable. This replaces the earlier Semester 1 2025 transition wording.
usyd-claim-3
Your unit outline includes a "Use of AI" column to indicate whether you can use AI or not for each assessment.
Unit of study outlines; lines 39-39 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
You can use AI in open (unsupervised) assessments. These assessments support the development of disciplinary knowledge, as well as AI literacy. As such, you're encouraged to use AI tools productively and responsibly as part of your learning experience.
Allowed use; lines 55-55 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
When you submit an open assessment, you'll need to appropriately acknowledge AI use so as not to breach academic integrity.
Allowed use; lines 59-59 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
You generally can't use AI in secure (supervised) assessments, unless the unit coordinator has given express permission in the unit outline. Using AI when not allowed could amount to a breach of academic integrity, for which you could be investigated.
Prohibited use; lines 65-65 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
University of Sydney guidance states that misusing AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy, with examples including submitting AI-generated work without appropriate acknowledgment, using AI where it has been prohibited in a secure assessment such as a secure exam, and inputting University teaching or course materials, other students' content, external partners' intellectual property or any person's personal or health information. Citing non-existent references because AI output was not verified is not acceptable and risks an academic integrity breach.
Original evidence and scope
University of Sydney guidance states that misusing AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy, with examples including submitting AI-generated work without appropriate acknowledgment, using AI where it has been prohibited in a secure assessment such as a secure exam, and inputting University teaching or course materials, other students' content, external partners' intellectual property or any person's personal or health information. Citing non-existent references because AI output was not verified is not acceptable and risks an academic integrity breach.
usyd-claim-7
Misusing AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy. Examples of misuse include: Submitting AI-generated work without appropriate acknowledgment using AI where it has been prohibited in a ‘secure’ assessment type, such as during a secure exam inputting University teaching or course materials, content generated by another student, intellectual property from external partners, or any person’s personal or health information.
Misuse of AI; lines 71-77 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
Citing references that do not exist because you failed to verify AI outputs is not acceptable and puts you at risk of an academic integrity breach, alongside the likely loss of marks.
Misuse of AI (callout); lines 81-81 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
Do not input course materials, other students' work, or personal or health information into AI tools.
Requirement in this scope
Do not input course materials, other students' work, or personal or health information into AI tools.
Scope
University of Sydney student AI guidance (updated 2 June 2026); academic integrity, investigation and appeals pages; Graduate Research HDR AI guidance; Teaching@Sydney assessment framework; ChatGPT Edu and Student IT pages. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.
University of Sydney guidance states that misusing AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy, with examples including submitting AI-generated work without appropriate acknowledgment, using AI where it has been prohibited in a secure assessment such as a secure exam, and inputting University teaching or course materials, other students' content, external partners' intellectual property or any person's personal or health information. Citing non-existent references because AI output was not verified is not acceptable and risks an academic integrity breach.
Original evidence and scope
University of Sydney guidance states that misusing AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy, with examples including submitting AI-generated work without appropriate acknowledgment, using AI where it has been prohibited in a secure assessment such as a secure exam, and inputting University teaching or course materials, other students' content, external partners' intellectual property or any person's personal or health information. Citing non-existent references because AI output was not verified is not acceptable and risks an academic integrity breach.
usyd-claim-7
Misusing AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy. Examples of misuse include: Submitting AI-generated work without appropriate acknowledgment using AI where it has been prohibited in a ‘secure’ assessment type, such as during a secure exam inputting University teaching or course materials, content generated by another student, intellectual property from external partners, or any person’s personal or health information.
Misuse of AI; lines 71-77 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
Citing references that do not exist because you failed to verify AI outputs is not acceptable and puts you at risk of an academic integrity breach, alongside the likely loss of marks.
Misuse of AI (callout); lines 81-81 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
The University of Sydney's generative AI guardrails state that confidential, personal, proprietary, or otherwise sensitive information should not be entered into AI tools.
Original evidence and scope
The University of Sydney's generative AI guardrails state that confidential, personal, proprietary, or otherwise sensitive information should not be entered into AI tools.
usyd-claim-5
Do not enter confidential, personal, proprietary or otherwise sensitive information Do not rely on the accuracy of outputs Openly acknowledge your use of AI (e.g. educators must model best practice by being transparent and clear with students about how these tools are used)
The policy and assessment frameworks section, 'The University of Sydney's guardrails around generative AI'
Official university source ↗
HDR students: do not use AI to generate thesis content or polish a draft's academic language unless it is part of your approved methodology.
Requirement in this scope
HDR students: do not use AI to generate thesis content or polish a draft's academic language unless it is part of your approved methodology.
Scope
University of Sydney student AI guidance (updated 2 June 2026); academic integrity, investigation and appeals pages; Graduate Research HDR AI guidance; Teaching@Sydney assessment framework; ChatGPT Edu and Student IT pages. Institution audit remains PARTIAL.
Higher degree by research (HDR) students at the University of Sydney do not inherit the open-assessment AI permission. The Graduate Research guidance says generative AI may in general be used to improve spelling or grammar (spelling/grammar checkers and reference managers are permitted) but not to generate content; prompting AI to generate written or other content, uploading a draft to improve its academic language, and incorporating AI outputs as substantive thesis content are prohibited, except where AI is integral to the research design or methodology and approved by the supervisor and through the ethics arrangements. HDR students should never enter personal, sensitive or confidential information into any gen AI tool.
Original evidence and scope
Higher degree by research (HDR) students at the University of Sydney do not inherit the open-assessment AI permission. The Graduate Research guidance says generative AI may in general be used to improve spelling or grammar (spelling/grammar checkers and reference managers are permitted) but not to generate content; prompting AI to generate written or other content, uploading a draft to improve its academic language, and incorporating AI outputs as substantive thesis content are prohibited, except where AI is integral to the research design or methodology and approved by the supervisor and through the ethics arrangements. HDR students should never enter personal, sensitive or confidential information into any gen AI tool.
draft-claim-usyd-hdr-genai-rules
In general terms, gen AI tools may be used where, for example, they assist in improving the spelling or grammar of your writing, but not where they generate content for you.
Use of generative AI: General overview; lines 316-316 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
However, inputting prompts into a gen AI tool (e.g. Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, etc.) to generate written or other content; uploading a draft of your work into a gen AI tool to improve the academic language or any other aspect of your work; and/or incorporating gen AI outputs as substantive content in your thesis or other submitted work are all prohibited, except under certain circumstances as outlined under ‘Responsible use of generative AI in research’.
Use of generative AI: General overview; lines 320-320 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
The responsible use of gen AI tools may be permitted when it is integral to your research design or methodology and its use has been approved by your supervisor.
Responsible use of generative AI in research; lines 324-324 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
If you are considering using any form of gen AI or gen AI-assisted technology as part of your research methodology or in ways integral to your research project, you must check with your supervisor first to confirm whether this is permitted. Then it should be approved as part of your ethics arrangements.
Responsible use of generative AI in research; lines 326-326 of captured page text
Official university source ↗
Never enter or upload any personal, sensitive or confidential information into any gen AI tool.
Be mindful of the information you enter or upload; lines 340-340 of captured page text
Official university source ↗

AI use questioned?Investigation, possible outcomes and appeal

AI tools & access

ChatGPT EduInstitutional access / licenceUnder review
Not yet generally available to students; University single sign-on once released.
ChatGPT Edu · Access conditions
Planned institution-wide tool: student pilot planned for October 2026, release to all students scheduled for Semester 1 2027. Agents, plugins and connectors assessed individually before enabling. Australian data residency at rest, globally routed inference.
Not yet generally available to students; University single sign-on once released.
Not stated as a student charge; University cost is commercial in confidence.
ChatGPT Edu · Official evidence
Source 1 ↗
Original quotation
A student pilot of ChatGPT Edu is planned for October 2026, around the time of the staff release of the tool. Following the pilot, ChatGPT Edu is scheduled for release to all students in Semester 1 2027.
Source 2 ↗
Original quotation
Additional capabilities such as custom GPTs, agents, plugins, connectors and other advanced features will be individually assessed before being enabled.
Source 3 ↗
Original quotation
The University of Sydney's ChatGPT Edu workspace has Australian data residency at rest and globally routed inference.
Microsoft Copilot ChatOfficial recommendationRecorded as allowed in the source scope
Sign in with your University account via Okta.
Microsoft Copilot Chat · Access conditions
University-endorsed, free for all students; described as the go-to option for students' AI needs and usable with public and protected information (only some highly protected data). Assessment use still depends on the unit outline.
Sign in with your University account via Okta.
Free for all students.
Microsoft Copilot Chat · Official evidence
Source 1 ↗
Original quotation
Microsoft Copilot is a University endorsed GenAI tool and is free for all students. You're welcome to use it for assessments provided you are aware of how to use AI tools responsibly.
Source 2 ↗
Original quotation
The go-to option for students' AI needs. Microsoft Copilot Chat is secure, supported, and ready to use with public and protected information (but only some highly protected data). For data protection, always sign in with your University account via Okta.
CognitiUniversity-hosted serviceConditions apply
Through units where educators provide Cogniti agents.
Cogniti · Access conditions
University-built teaching AI platform designed by Sydney educators; students use agents provided in their units.
Through units where educators provide Cogniti agents.
Not stated in the reviewed sources.
Cogniti · Official evidence
Source 1 ↗
Original quotation
Designed by University of Sydney educators, Cogniti assists student learning in interactive and context-sensitive ways.
Harvey AIInstitutional access / licenceConditions apply
Sydney Law School students; see the Law School FAQs.
Harvey AI · Access conditions
Legal-specialist AI tool available to all Sydney Law School students (faculty-specific, not university-wide).
Sydney Law School students; see the Law School FAQs.
Not stated in the reviewed sources.
Harvey AI · Official evidence
Source 1 ↗
Original quotation
All University of Sydney Law School students have access to Harvey AI, a legal-specialist AI tool used across the profession.

Record updatesLast 90 days · Recorded updates: 2

Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.

2026-10-27Page update
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
2026-10-20Held / removed from current conclusions · Record addition · Site correction
Coursework · Exams · 5 more topics · Records involved: 11 (5 corrected / adjusted · 5 added · 1 held)
View revision
Loading revision…

Reviewed claims

Held conclusions and historical evidence (1)

These original records and prior review states are retained for provenance, not as current permissions, duties or precise deadlines.

Historical rule (Academic Integrity Policy 2022 as described in the Teaching@Sydney FAQ): students could only use assistance, including automated writing tools, if the unit of study outline expressly permitted it. Current student guidance (updated 2 June 2026) instead allows AI in open assessments and generally prohibits it in secure assessments unless expressly permitted, so this undated prior-permission rule is held as historical and not shown as a current university-wide rule. The current Policy Register text was not re-read clause by clause.

Current status: held; historical review state: needs_review

usyd-claim-2

Clause 5(16) (2) mentions that students may only use assistance, including automated writing tools, if the unit of study outline expressly permits it. (5)(b) mentions that students must acknowledge assistance provided when preparing submitted work, including the use of automated writing tools.
Frequently asked questions about generative AI at Sydney
058efdd957971901a0e660842c9c6489291b59f707f0ce8389586021ae393a1e

Official sources

11 official URLs; 12 source attributions and their captured versions retained.

Using artificial intelligence tools responsibly (last updated 2 June 2026)

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

Using artificial intelligence tools responsibly (last updated 2 June 2026) · 2026-10-20T05:35:36Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

c5c9c40bab94402e0943669b6a1187ef57e3a43e766ca2a896f98fa2d818142b

Using artificial intelligence tools responsibly · 2026-05-10T14:20:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

abfbc1fd30f4e356a25ac73a7426ed5703af63a9f5e0307b37c2fd249d0d68d7

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Student IT: apps and software

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

Student IT: apps and software · 2026-10-20T05:35:37Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

81af3a0c8d7bb45219d0ad877118d356fb3346b070404e4d92a68312e71fe548

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Graduate Research: Getting started (Use of generative artificial intelligence)

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

Graduate Research, The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

Graduate Research: Getting started (Use of generative artificial intelligence) · 2026-10-20T05:54:24Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

315ab3cccc95bc4f98db73c548d50b8d5dc97e68dead644f249935c683f0f0f1

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Graduate Research: Preparing your thesis

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

Graduate Research, The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

Graduate Research: Preparing your thesis · 2026-10-20T05:54:25Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

48ee868f346d41c0addb36093ed6548c6a6697836049dd0303e8beb8a9eb846a

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Academic appeals

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

Academic appeals · 2026-10-20T05:55:28Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

bb6f0d403ed4a71b0d0f71fd6a184e91bb5145fb10e84946d589e7f163aa5d43

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Appealing a misconduct outcome

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

Appealing a misconduct outcome · 2026-10-20T05:55:29Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

d201fb90b6a25b329d6b8d61b7657ba9b5974b76d201d674fa8d4120660ae710

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Detection and investigation of academic integrity breaches (last updated 2 June 2026)

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

Detection and investigation of academic integrity breaches (last updated 2 June 2026) · 2026-10-20T05:55:29Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

58463fa9bd09ebeaf674041801f0a940cf84c7345b845b0a1ba145c952ace5d6

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

ChatGPT Edu (students)

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

The University of Sydney

Hash and captured version

ChatGPT Edu (students) · 2026-10-20T05:55:10Z

SHA-256 of the retained capture file bytes.

dd7b4d834ba379380ba985db473d5fbe2346e22bd6a91d5dd065dc417252e55e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Frequently asked questions about generative AI at Sydney

educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au

University official source

educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Frequently asked questions about generative AI at Sydney · 2026-05-10T14:21:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

058efdd957971901a0e660842c9c6489291b59f707f0ce8389586021ae393a1e

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Aligning our assessments to the age of generative AI

educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au

University official source

educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Aligning our assessments to the age of generative AI · 2026-05-10T14:22:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

40b1a9c73e76e9eeb8c7d22e91d920e679dd28271b27494172e6110c6b48f926

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Assessment Procedures

www.sydney.edu.au

University official source

sydney.edu.au

Hash and captured version

Assessment Procedures · 2026-05-10T14:22:00.000Z

Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.

4981f1bde50adc698d04d6110ef088d95f760d85cb0601080d3743d90a9e9f2f

Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.

Official source ↗

Record information, JSON & citation

Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.

Claim review state: agent_reviewed
Analysis review state: machine_candidate
Record revision: qs25-31-v6-r1-20261020
Dataset release: public-release-20260924-002
Correction published: 2026-10-20T12:00:00Z
Student snapshot: Not published

Current reviewed JSON · Historical baseline

Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.

Current reviewed JSON

Questions students ask

Can I use AI for my coursework?

View evidence →

Do I need to disclose AI use?

View evidence →

Can I upload sensitive data?

View evidence →

Which tools can I access?

View evidence →

What are the examination rules?

View evidence →