AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
claim-aus-gai-assessment-permission
Policy Statement, Authorization of usage of GAI tools
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
claim-aus-instructors-syllabus-ai-details
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Sécurité et acquisitionAmerican University of Sharjah
Non mentionné dans les sources examinées
Statut et portée
Scope stated in the cited claims
Preuves officielles originales
Aucune preuve examinée n’est incluse pour ce sujet. Cela ne prouve pas l’absence de règle.
Mises à jour du registre90 derniers jours
Mises à jour de nos données vérifiées ; elles ne confirment pas un changement de politique de l’université.
Les mises à jour ne sont pas encore disponibles pour cette page.
Fiche examinée
Énoncés examinés
6 énoncés examinés
Intégrité académique 3 énoncés examinés
Intégrité académique
AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.
Students must: Acknowledge, in line with course policy, any usage of the tool(s) in all material submitted for course credit including the name and version number of the tool(s).
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b4ff98fd…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Policy Statement, Student Responsibilities
Intégrité académique
AUS policy says the institution does not prohibit generative AI detection software in academic integrity adjudication but recognizes detection output cannot provide a definitive judgment.
The institution does not prohibit the use of GAI detection software at any stage of the academic integrity adjudication process but does recognize that the output of such tools cannot provide a definitive judgement on whether an academic integrity violation has taken place.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b4ff98fd…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
GAI detection software
Enseignement 1 énoncés examinés
Enseignement
AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.
Course instructors must: Include the following details in the course syllabus: Name(s) of the generative AI tool(s) that can be used; Brief rationale for using the tool(s); Instructions on which assignments and class activities the tool(s) can be used for.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b4ff98fd…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Policy Statement, Course Instructor and Student Responsibilities
Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA 1 énoncés examinés
Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA
AUS policy says students are responsible for the accuracy of AI-generated output in their work and must ensure use complies with syllabus, iLearn updates, academic integrity policy, and IT acceptable use policy.
Students must: Take full responsibility for the accuracy of AI generated output in any work they produce. Ensure that any use of the tool(s) is compliant with the course syllabus, any updates posted on the course ilearn page, the most recent versions of the AUS academic integrity policy, and the AUS IT acceptable use policy.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b4ff98fd…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Policy Statement, Student Responsibilities
État de la source 1 énoncés examinés
État de la source
AUS policy applies to undergraduate and graduate teaching and learning environments and says faculty research use of generative AI tools is not covered by this policy.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "American University of Sharjah AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/american-university-of-sharjah
La langue d’origine de la source universitaire fait foi. Ce suivi n’est pas une déclaration officielle de l’université.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions fréquentes
Questions fréquentes
Puis-je utiliser l’IA pour mes travaux ?
American University of Sharjah has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
