Change log

Carnegie Mellon University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 12, 2026Last changedMay 12, 2026Claims7Sources6Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

Carnegie Mellon University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Carnegie Mellon University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # Carnegie Mellon University AI policy record
2+privacy: CMU Computing Services guidance says public AI tools should not be used with student data, confidential research, or sensitive administrative tasks.
3+Evidence (en, 89586f793913): Never use public AI tools with student data, confidential research, or sensitive administrative tasks.
4+ai_tool_treatment: CMU Computing Services lists protected AI tools available at CMU and states that when users sign in with Andrew ID and password, each listed tool is FERPA-compliant and will not use data to train AI models.
5+Evidence (en, 924d9a08d692): The AI tools listed on this page are available at CMU. When you sign in with your Andrew ID and password, each tool is FERPA-compliant and will not use your data to train its AI models.
6+ai_tool_treatment: CMU Eberly Center guidance identifies a growing list of CMU-vetted generative AI tools that are FERPA compliant for teaching and learning when used as instructed.
7+Evidence (en, 1f5671e5b9d2): What generative AI tools have been vetted by CMU? A growing list of tools have been vetted by CMU that are FERPA compliant and therefore able to be used for teaching and learning purposes.
8+academic_integrity: CMU Eberly Center guidance recommends extreme caution when using AI-detection tools because no such tools have been established as accurate.
9+Evidence (en, 1f5671e5b9d2): The Eberly Center recommends extreme caution when attempting to detect whether student work has been aided or fully generated by AI. Although companies like Turnitin offer AI detection services , none have been established as accurate.
10+teaching: CMU Eberly Center guidance says instructors should clarify whether AI tools count as authorized or unauthorized assistance and how students should cite AI or human assistance.
11+Evidence (en, 1f5671e5b9d2): We recommend that you adopt an academic integrity policy that considers the following: Whether or not AI tools are considered authorized or unauthorized assistance and in what circumstances.
12+academic_integrity: CMU academic-integrity policy requires instructor authorization for collaboration or assistance on graded work and requires citation of all sources.
13+Evidence (en, 953acf3271ee): Collaboration or assistance on academic work to be graded is not permitted unless explicitly authorized by the course instructor(s). The citation of all sources is required.
14+academic_integrity: CMU career guidance tells student job seekers that AI tools should aid revisions and editing rather than replace original words, thinking, information, and writing.
15+Evidence (en, d762b0ba142b): AI tools should serve as a starting point or a tool to aid in revisions and editing and not in place of original words, thinking, information and writing.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

CMU Computing Services guidance says public AI tools should not be used with student data, confidential research, or sensitive administrative tasks.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

CMU Computing Services lists protected AI tools available at CMU and states that when users sign in with Andrew ID and password, each listed tool is FERPA-compliant and will not use data to train AI models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

CMU Eberly Center guidance identifies a growing list of CMU-vetted generative AI tools that are FERPA compliant for teaching and learning when used as instructed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

CMU Eberly Center guidance recommends extreme caution when using AI-detection tools because no such tools have been established as accurate.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

CMU Eberly Center guidance says instructors should clarify whether AI tools count as authorized or unauthorized assistance and how students should cite AI or human assistance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

CMU academic-integrity policy requires instructor authorization for collaboration or assistance on graded work and requires citation of all sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

CMU career guidance tells student job seekers that AI tools should aid revisions and editing rather than replace original words, thinking, information, and writing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesen