Tietueen versio
Tämän sivuston tarkistetun tietueen päivityksiä, ei vahvistus sille, että yliopisto on muuttanut käytäntöään.
Seurannan julkaisuaika ei ole yliopiston politiikan voimaantulopäivä.
Mukana olevat tietueet: 8 (2 korjattu / mukautettu · 6 lisätty)
Tekoälytyökalujen käsittely · Tutkimus · 7 muuta aihetta
JZUS manuscript authors must disclose substantive GenAI use explicitly and in detail, retain human responsibility and never list AI as author. The journal limits permitted assistance and prohibits AI-generated original contributions or fabricated data/images. This is a journal policy, not campus coursework permission.
University security training covers AI-use standards, privacy/security risks, compliance and incident handling for the campus community. It does not establish approved vendor data categories, storage retention or a procurement process.
University notices name the 浙大先生 platform and require participating teachers to comply with a trial teaching GenAI standard. The standard’s full normative text is unavailable; the notices do not establish current student eligibility or assignment/exam permission.
The2026 appeal regulation covers specified enrolment/status/withdrawal/discipline decisions: written appeal within10 days from receipt. Initial screening is3 working days; corrections requested within5 working days. Written reply normally15 days, extendable15 with approval; corrected applications restart that reply clock. External provincial appeal is15 days after receipt of review opinion. The2026 rule repeals2015; unspecified “days” are not converted to working days.
The2025 student disciplinary regulation provides possible warnings, demerit/probation or expulsion according to the applicable violation and severity. General research-misconduct clauses require the academic committee’s determination. These are not automatic penalties for any AI use.
Before an adverse disciplinary decision, students are told facts/reasons/basis and may state and defend their case. Before probation/expulsion they are told of the hearing-request right. Major decisions undergo legal review and the stated university decision process.
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE policy says AI or large language models cannot be listed as manuscript authors or co-authors, authors remain responsible for AI-assisted content, and substantive generative AI use in manuscript preparation must be disclosed explicitly and in detail.
For submissions to Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, AI and LLM systems cannot be manuscript authors or co-authors. Authors retain responsibility for AI-assisted content, must disclose substantive generative-AI use explicitly and in detail in the manuscript, and follow the journal’s permitted-use and prohibited-use conditions. This journal-specific policy is not a university-wide coursework or thesis rule.
浙大先生智能体平台 is listed for Zhejiang University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Zhejiang University names and promotes the “浙大先生” intelligent-agent platform for learning, research and campus services. Institutional announcements do not by themselves establish permission to use AI for a particular assessment, or current eligibility for all students; consult the applicable course rules and current service access conditions.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
Vertailukelpoista vanhaa ja uutta tekstiä ei ole saatavilla.
