Policy presence
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Amman, Jordan
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.
No source-backed public claim about exam AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Research
Normalized value: journal_legal_studies_ai_limited_language_support_prohibits_content_data_references_conclusions_unverified_content
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Permitted Uses of AI Tools AI may be used only for: Language editing and proofreading; Correcting grammatical or spelling errors; Rephrasing text without altering meaning; Summarizing texts written by the researcher. Prohibited Uses AI must not be used for: Generating scientific content in whole or in part; Creating or manipulating data or figures; Inventing references; Writing conclusions or conducting analysis; Submitting AI-generated content without scientific verification.
Research
Normalized value: journal_legal_studies_ai_content_limit_similarity_limit_disclosure_turnitin_sanctions
Evidencia original
Evidence 1AI-generated content must not exceed 35%. Similarity Index must not exceed 30%. Editors may reject any manuscript suspected of containing AI-generated material. Authors must: Confirm originality of ideas and results; Review AI-edited content; Disclose AI usage; Assume responsibility for plagiarism or AI errors. Verification Tools The journal uses AI-detection and plagiarism tools, including: Turnitin AI Detector. Violation Penalty Possible sanctions include: Rejection without review; Author ban; Notifying the author's institution; Retraction of published papers.
Research
Normalized value: business_journal_authors_disclose_ai_tools_review_verify_ai_generated_content
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Use of Artificial Intelligence Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in the preparation of manuscripts. AI-generated content must be properly reviewed and verified by the authors.
Source Status
Normalized value: student_guidebook_general_integrity_context_no_ai_specific_student_rule_found_in_guidebook_text
Evidencia original
Evidence 1Checking for plagiarism in master's theses before and after the defense is the responsibility of the Deanship of Graduate Studies ... ensuring that the plagiarism percentage does not exceed the allowed limit of 30%. Subject to Article (42) ... cases of plagiarism or doubt thereof shall be referred to the Theses Ethics committee.
Vista localizada only
The guidebook has general plagiarism and thesis-ethics rules. Full-text checks for AI-specific terms did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in this PDF.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
zuj.edu.jo
zjjb.zuj.edu.jo
journals.zuj.edu.jo