University AI Policy Tracker

Registros abiertos y basados en evidencia sobre politicas universitarias de IA.

APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Riga Technical University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims4Sources3Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Riga Technical University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Riga Technical University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Riga Technical University combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Riga Technical University AI policy record
2+research: The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.
3+Evidence (en, cd2edb4d2797): The Journal "Scriptus Manet" mandates the transparent disclosure of any utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in manuscript preparation ... The utilization of AI tools for the generation of scholarly content, encompassing the development of ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, is prohibited.
4+academic_integrity: RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.
5+Evidence (en, 59eff26517db): Artificial intelligence tools can be used to generate content for the graduation thesis in case: a) it is not related to the skills and knowledge that the student is required to demonstrate ... c) it is authorized or supported by the study program ... The use of such tools is also not allowed for the formulation of the goal, tasks, and conclusions of the thesis.
6+research: The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.
7+Evidence (en, cd2edb4d2797): The author(s) are entirely accountable for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all content within the submitted manuscript, including sections generated with the aid of AI tools. Authors remain ethically and legally accountable for issues such as plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency, regardless of AI usage.
8+academic_integrity: RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.
9+Evidence (en, 59eff26517db): Correct referencing methods regarding the content generated by artificial intelligence tools are given in Appendix 7 of these guidelines. In the appendices to the graduation thesis, the student should include a screenshot of the response provided by the artificial intelligence tool.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

4 claim records

research

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesen

research

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions