University AI Policy Tracker

Registros abiertos y basados en evidencia sobre politicas universitarias de IA.

APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPL

Change log

IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims7Sources1Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+14-0
11 # IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) AI policy record
2+privacy: IPB guidance says AI use must consider IPB security and confidentiality rules; AI use must not disclose or store personal information of students, lecturers, or education staff without permission, and must protect academic data.
3+Evidence (id, 668be5bbb86c): Penggunaan AI harus memperhatikan konsep keamanan dan kerahasiaan data yang telah ditetapkan di IPB... Data Pribadi Mahasiswa, Dosen dan Tendik: Penggunaan AI tidak boleh mengungkapkan atau menyimpan informasi pribadi mahasiswa, dosen, dan tenaga kependidikan tanpa izin. Data Akademik: Penggunaan AI dalam tugas, penelitian, dan administrasi harus mempertimbangkan perlindungan data akademik agar tidak disalahgunakan oleh pihak eksternal
4+security_review: IPB guidance identifies LMITD, DRI, and DTPTP as bodies authorized to regulate AI use supporting IPB academic activities; IPB academic community members must comply with established AI-use rules and consult the relevant body where required.
5+Evidence (id, 668be5bbb86c): Di IPB, terdapat beberapa lembaga yang berwenang untuk mengatur penggunaan AI dalam menunjang kegiatan akademik, di antaranya: Lembaga Manajemen Informasi dan Transformasi Digital (LMITD) IPB, Direktorat Riset dan Inovasi (DRI) IPB, dan Direktorat Transformasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Pembelajaran (DTPTP) IPB... Setiap civitas akademik IPB wajib mematuhi peraturan penggunaan teknologi AI yang telah ditetapkan... maka civitas akademik IPB wajib berkonsultasi dengan lembaga terkait.
6+source_status: IPB has a central Indonesian-language AI guidance document for Tridarma use, intended as an IPB guide for lecturers, students, education staff, and units, and it cites IPB Academic Senate Regulation No. 47 of 2023 as a basis.
7+Evidence (id, 668be5bbb86c): Panduan ini disusun untuk memberikan pemahaman mendalam tentang bagaimana dosen, mahasiswa dan tenaga kependidikan dapat menggunakan AI dengan bijak, sesuai dengan standar akademik... Sebagai acuan bagi fakultas/sekolah dan unit dalam membuat panduan penggunaan AI sesuai dengan tugas pokok dan fungsinya. Dasar penyusunan... Peraturan Senat Akademik Institut Pertanian Bogor Nomor 47 Tahun 2023 tentang Norma Dan Etika Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) dalam Penyelenggaraan Tridharma Perguruan Tinggi di Lingkungan Institut Pertanian Bogor
8+academic_integrity: IPB guidance says AI-generated publication content should be thoroughly reviewed for factual accuracy, validity, originality, academic standards, and copyright compliance, and that IPB AI users are fully responsible for content they publish or share.
9+Evidence (id, 668be5bbb86c): Konten yang dihasilkan oleh AI harus diperiksa secara menyeluruh untuk memastikan tidak ada kesalahan faktual atau penyebaran informasi yang tidak valid. Dalam kegiatan tridarma perguruan tinggi, pengguna AI di IPB bertanggung jawab penuh atas setiap konten yang dipublikasikan atau dibagikan.
10+ai_tool_treatment: IPB supports AI use in Tridarma activities when it is ethical, responsible, and consistent with academic principles and professionalism.
11+Evidence (id, 668be5bbb86c): Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) mendukung pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan (AI) untuk kegiatan Tridarma Perguruan Tinggi secara etis dan bertanggung jawab, dengan tetap menjunjung tinggi prinsip-prinsip akademik dan profesionalisme.
12+research: For research writing, IPB guidance says lecturers and students must not use AI outputs as-is without re-editing, content evaluation, and proper references; directly copying AI text risks academic-ethics violations and plagiarism.
13+Evidence (id, 668be5bbb86c): Dosen dan mahasiswa tidak boleh menggunakan hasil keluaran dari AI begitu saja tanpa melakukan proses penyuntingan ulang, evaluasi isi, dan pemberian rujukan yang sesuai... Menyalin teks tanpa penyuntingan juga berisiko melanggar etika akademik dan dapat dianggap sebagai plagiarisme. Oleh karena itu, hasil dari AI harus ditulis ulang dengan gaya penulisan ilmiah, disesuaikan dengan tujuan penelitian, dan jika mengandung informasi atau gagasan penting, wajib disertai dengan referensi yang sahih.
14+teaching: For education, IPB guidance says GenAI use should be human-centered, pedagogically appropriate, ethical, human-controlled, aligned with learning objectives, and accountable for AI-content accuracy and impact.
15+Evidence (id, 668be5bbb86c): Penggunaan GenAI pada dasarnya perlu pendekatan 'human-centred and pedagogically appropriate interaction'... Lima pertimbangan utama dalam penggunaan GenAI meliputi: penggunaan GenAI harus lebih efektif dari tanpa GenAI, etika harus mendasari penggunaan GenAI oleh dosen dan mahasiswa, proses penggunaan GenAI harus dikendalikan oleh manusia, pemilihan GenAI dan konten sesuai dengan tujuan pembelajaran... dan akuntabilitas manusia atas keakuratan konten AI serta dampaknya.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

IPB guidance says AI use must consider IPB security and confidentiality rules; AI use must not disclose or store personal information of students, lecturers, or education staff without permission, and must protect academic data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesid

security_review

IPB guidance identifies LMITD, DRI, and DTPTP as bodies authorized to regulate AI use supporting IPB academic activities; IPB academic community members must comply with established AI-use rules and consult the relevant body where required.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesid

source_status

IPB has a central Indonesian-language AI guidance document for Tridarma use, intended as an IPB guide for lecturers, students, education staff, and units, and it cites IPB Academic Senate Regulation No. 47 of 2023 as a basis.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesid

academic_integrity

IPB guidance says AI-generated publication content should be thoroughly reviewed for factual accuracy, validity, originality, academic standards, and copyright compliance, and that IPB AI users are fully responsible for content they publish or share.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesid

ai_tool_treatment

IPB supports AI use in Tridarma activities when it is ethical, responsible, and consistent with academic principles and professionalism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesid

research

For research writing, IPB guidance says lecturers and students must not use AI outputs as-is without re-editing, content evaluation, and proper references; directly copying AI text risks academic-ethics violations and plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesid

teaching

For education, IPB guidance says GenAI use should be human-centered, pedagogically appropriate, ethical, human-controlled, aligned with learning objectives, and accountable for AI-content accuracy and impact.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesid

Source snapshots

1 source attribution