public-release-20260715-005
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
Eindhoven University of Technology public-release-20260715-005 diff
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Eindhoven University of Technology currently has 11 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 16, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This page combines all public release diffs for Eindhoven University of Technology. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
1 public release diff
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
11 claim records
Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
TU/e classifies AI-tool use as fraud if submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own or if the student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.
TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.
TU/e requires a complete statement when GenAI is used in a way that partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.
TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.
TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.
TU/e warns AI users not to enter sensitive information or data and to follow the GDPR because AI tools carry privacy, security, storage, copyright, NDA, intellectual property, and data-processing risks.
TU/e's public Education Guide identifies the AI Rules_TUe.pdf as outlining the key policies for AI use in students' studies.
TU/e's public Canvas AI-in-education guidance says students cannot be required to use ChatGPT because TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for ChatGPT, and points to Microsoft Copilot as a protected alternative available with a TU/e account.
For TU/e Industrial Design, a reference list showing typical generative-AI faulty-reference patterns is treated as a Category 2 infringement, with repeat offences treated as Category 3.
For TU/e Industrial Design students, the department-level Academic Fraud page says AI tools should not be used unless the current semester project Canvas guidelines are followed.
5 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:14 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:22 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 16, 2026, 1:28 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:18 PM
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:19 PM