Change log

Eindhoven University of Technology

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Eindhoven University of Technology currently has 11 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 16, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

This page combines all public release diffs for Eindhoven University of Technology. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted1Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added1Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Eindhoven University of Technology combined release diff

Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.

+5-0
11 # Eindhoven University of Technology AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 5557b6bda5f5): TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-16T01:28:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://educationguide.tue.nl/news-events/news/29-04-2024-discover-microsoft-copilot snapshot 5557b6bda5f562f731f105aea15c5d169dd7fd721ad7bb566168fd362fb7c8f4
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-16T01:28:43.896Z

Release history

1 public release diff

public-release-20260715-005

Compared with public-release-20260714-002.

Policy text0Newly extracted1Source snapshots0Source text0

Eindhoven University of Technology public-release-20260715-005 diff

Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.

+5-0
11 # Eindhoven University of Technology AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, 5557b6bda5f5): TU/e's official Education Guide invites users to explore Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise as a safe alternative to ChatGPT and states that the protected version is readily available using a TU/e account as login.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-16T01:28:43.896Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://educationguide.tue.nl/news-events/news/29-04-2024-discover-microsoft-copilot snapshot 5557b6bda5f562f731f105aea15c5d169dd7fd721ad7bb566168fd362fb7c8f4
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-16T01:28:43.896Z

Claim changes

11 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

TU/e classifies AI-tool use as fraud if submitted work is no longer sufficiently the student's own or if the student has not included a correct statement about the AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

TU/e requires a complete statement when GenAI is used in a way that partially replaces or outsources the student's own work and learning process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

research

TU/e states that generating quantitative or qualitative research data with GenAI is fundamentally prohibited unless the examiner gives explicit consent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

TU/e warns AI users not to enter sensitive information or data and to follow the GDPR because AI tools carry privacy, security, storage, copyright, NDA, intellectual property, and data-processing risks.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

TU/e's public Education Guide identifies the AI Rules_TUe.pdf as outlining the key policies for AI use in students' studies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

procurement

TU/e's public Canvas AI-in-education guidance says students cannot be required to use ChatGPT because TU/e has no processor agreement or contract for ChatGPT, and points to Microsoft Copilot as a protected alternative available with a TU/e account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design, a reference list showing typical generative-AI faulty-reference patterns is treated as a Category 2 infringement, with repeat offences treated as Category 3.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For TU/e Industrial Design students, the department-level Academic Fraud page says AI tools should not be used unless the current semester project Canvas guidelines are followed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions